[2018] KEHC 6166 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence presented by the prosecution, namely the testimonies of the deceased's wife and daughter, alleged that the accused assaulted the deceased. However, the post mortem evidence by Dr. Charo indicated that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 6166 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Paul Mukhebi Ochudi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 11 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling at Close of Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Acquittal, Criminal Procedure, Fair Trial Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Paul Mukhebi Ochudi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling at Close of Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant him being placed on his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence adduced connected the accused to the cause of death of the deceased.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The evidence presented by the prosecution, namely the testimonies of the deceased's wife and daughter, alleged that the accused assaulted the deceased. However, the post mortem evidence by Dr. Charo indicated that the cause of death was cardiac arrest in a patient with chronic lung disease, and there was no evidence connecting the alleged assault to the death. In the absence of such connection, and applying the standard for a prima facie case as set out in RAMANLAL T. BHAT vs. R, the court held that no reasonable tribunal could convict the accused on the evidence presented if no explanation...
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- The accused is acquitted under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- The accused is set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 11 OF 2017
REPUBLIC...................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
PAUL MUKHEBI OCHUDI................................................ACCUSED
RULING
1. At the close of the prosecution case I was urged to make a finding that the prosecution did not establish a prima facie case against the accused person to warrant him being placed on his defence. The prosecution on the other hand contended that it had discharged its burden.
2. What is a prima facie case? In the case of RAMANLAL T. BHAT vs. R [1957] E.A 332, 335the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa in defining a prima facie case said:
A mere scintilla of evidence can never be enough: nor can any amount of worthless discredited evidence. It is true, as Wilson, J., said, that the court is not required at that stage to decide finally whether the evidence is worthy of credit, or whether if believed it is weighty enough to prove the case conclusively: that final determination can only properly be made when the case for the defence has been heard. It may not be easy to define what is meant by a “prima facie case,” but at least it must mean one on which a reasonable tribunal, properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence.[Emphasis added]
3. In the instant case the evidence against the accused is that of Fostine Okello (PW1) the wife of the deceased and her daughter Miriam Okello (PW2). The gist of their evidence is that the accused used a stick to beat the deceased on the back and that he kicked him once on the abdomen. However according to the evidence ofDr. Sande Kahindi Charo (PW3) who performed the post mortem, the cause of death of the deceased was cardiac arrest in a patient who had been ill and had chronic lung disease.
4. There was no evidence that was adduced to connect the alleged assault and the findings of Dr. Charo (PW3). Article 50 (2) (i) of the Constitution of Kenya provides as follows:
Every accused person has the right to a fair trial, which includes the right—
(i) to remain silent, and not to testify during the proceedings;
If the accused opts to exercise this right, then no conviction can be based on the evidence on record.
5. I accordingly find that no prima facie case has been established by the prosecution to warrant him to be placed on his defence. I acquit him under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and set him free unless if otherwise lawfully held.
DELIVEREDandSIGNEDatBUSIA this 29thdayof May, 2018
KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
JUDGE