[2017] KEHC 101 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence through four witnesses to establish a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. Consequently, the accused is required to enter his defence as per the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ruling does not determine...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 101 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Paul Mwangi Kagema
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 79 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to give his defence.
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Paul Mwangi Kagema
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant his being put on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence through four witnesses to establish a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder. Consequently, the accused is required to enter his defence as per the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ruling does not determine guilt but merely finds that the prosecution's evidence, if unchallenged, would be sufficient to justify a conviction, thus necessitating the accused to respond to the charge.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to give his defence.
Orders
- The accused shall give his defence to the charge of murder.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 79 OF 2013
REPUBLIC .............................................STATE
VERSUS
PAUL MWANGI KAGEMA .........ACCUSED
RULING
The accused PAUL MWANGI KAGEMA faces a charge of MURDER CONTRARY TO SECTION 203 as read with SECTION 204 OF THE PENAL CODE. The prosecution have called a total of four (4) witnesses in support of their case.
I have considered the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses. I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established. I therefore direct that the accused shall give his defence to the charge.
Dated and delivered in Nakuru this 7th day of April, 2017.
Mr Chengetich holding brief for Mr. Mongeri
Court– Hearing 16/6/2017 for defence hearing.
Maureen A. Odero
Judge