[2014] KEHC 720 (KLR)
The court found that the accused is entitled to bond pending trial as a constitutional right under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. The State did not provide any compelling reasons to deny bond. The pre-bail report supported the accused's release. Therefore, the accused was granted bond on specified terms.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 720 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Paul Okebilo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2014
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 85 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Accused granted bond pending trial.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Right to Bond, Compelling Reasons, Pre Bail Report
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Paul Okebilo
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bond pending trial under the Constitution of Kenya 2010.
- 2 Whether the State has provided compelling reasons to deny the accused bond.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused is entitled to bond pending trial as a constitutional right under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010. The State did not provide any compelling reasons to deny bond. The pre-bail report supported the accused's release. Therefore, the accused was granted bond on specified terms.
Court Disposition
Accused granted bond pending trial.
Orders
- The accused shall be released on bond of Kshs.500,000 with two sureties of similar amount.
- In the alternative, the accused may be released on cash bail of Kshs.200,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment