[2018] KEHC 2853 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2853 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence through witness testimony and exhibits to establish a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused was found to have a case to answer and was called upon to make his defence as required by law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2853 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Peter Karanja
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Murder Case 39 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Outcome
Accused found to have a case to answer and called upon to make his defence.
Judges
FN Muchemi
Legal Topics
Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Prima Facie Case Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Respondent

Peter Karanja

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence presented links the accused to the alleged murders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence through witness testimony and exhibits to establish a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused was found to have a case to answer and was called upon to make his defence as required by law.

Court Disposition

Accused found to have a case to answer and called upon to make his defence.

Orders

  • The accused is found to have a case to answer.
  • The accused is hereby called upon to make his defence.