[2020] KEHC 516 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to annex the judgment that forms the basis of the decree and certificate of order against the government, which is a critical document for establishing an arguable case for leave to apply for judicial review orders. As a result, the threshold for an arguable case was not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 516 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lucy Nduta Wambui; Respondent: Principal Secretary, Ministry of Defence; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E081 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders of Mandamus
- Outcome
- leave to file supplementary affidavit granted; hearing date set; directions for electronic filing and service issued
- Judges
- P Nyamweya
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Leave to Apply, Government Liability
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucy Nduta Wambui
Applicant
Principal Secretary, Ministry of Defence
Respondent
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders of Mandamus
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has met the threshold for grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders of mandamus.
- 2 Whether the failure to annex the judgment forming the basis of the decree and certificate affects the application for leave.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to annex the judgment that forms the basis of the decree and certificate of order against the government, which is a critical document for establishing an arguable case for leave to apply for judicial review orders. As a result, the threshold for an arguable case was not met. However, the court granted the applicant leave to file and serve a supplementary affidavit annexing the certified copy of the judgment, and set the matter for hearing on a future date, with directions for electronic filing and service in light of COVID-19 protocols.
Court Disposition
leave to file supplementary affidavit granted; hearing date set; directions for electronic filing and service issued
Orders
- The ex parte applicant is granted leave to file and serve a supplementary affidavit annexing the certified copy of the judgment issued in Nairobi CMCC No. 7724 Of 2017.
- The Chamber Summons dated 15th December 2020 shall be heard on 28th January 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO.MISC E081 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF MANDAMUS
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC............................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
PRINCIPALSECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE..........................................1ST RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL....................................2ND RESPONDENT
EX PARTE APPLICANT:..................................LUCY NDUTA WAMBUI
RULING
1. Lucy Nduta Wambui, the ex parte Applicant herein, has moved this Court in an application brought by way of Chamber Summons dated 15th December 2020, wherein she is seeking leave to apply for judicial review orders of Mandamus directed to the Respondents to settle the decretal sum awarded in Nairobi CMCC No. 7724 Of 2017-Lucy Nduta Wambui vs Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Defence & The Attorney Generalof Kshs 998,452. 60 together with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from 13/01/2020 until payment in full. She also prays that the costs of the application .
2. The said application is supported by a statutory statement dated 15th December 2020, and a verifying affidavit sworn on the same date by the Applicant. The main ground for the application is that judgment for the decretal sum was awarded in favour of the ex parte Applicant in Nairobi CMCC No. 7724 Of 2017-Lucy Nduta Wambui vs Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Defence & The Attorney General. However, that the Respondents have without any lawful authority and justification failed to pay the decretal sum despite demands made requesting settlement of the same.
3. The applicable law on leave to commence judicial review proceedings is Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which provides that no application for judicial review orders should be made unless leave of the court was sought and granted. The main reason for the leave as explained by Waki J. (as he then was), in Republic vs. County Council of Kwale & Another Ex Parte Kondo & 57 Others, Mombasa HCMCA No. 384 of 1996,is to ensure that an applicant is only allowed to proceed to substantive hearing if the Court is satisfied that there is a case fit for further consideration.
4. It is also trite that in an application for leave such as the present one, the Court ought not to delve deeply into the arguments of the parties, but should make cursory perusal of the evidence before court and make the decision as to whether an applicant’s case is sufficiently meritorious to justify leave.
5. Upon perusal of the instant application, I note that while the ex parte Applicant annexed of the decree and the Certificate of Order against Government issued in Nairobi CMCC No. 7724 Of 2017-Lucy Nduta Wambui vs Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Defence & The Attorney General, she has not annexed the judgment of delivered in the said case, which is the basis for the said decree and certificate.
6. In the premises, I find that the threshold of an arguable case has not been met by the ex parte Applicant for the grant of leave, and I hereby order as follows:
I. Theex parteApplicant is granted leave to file and serve a supplementary affidavit annexing the certified copy of the judgment issued inNairobi CMCC No. 7724 Of 2017-Lucy Nduta Wambui vs Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Defence & The Attorney General.
II. The Chamber Summons dated 15th December 2020 shall be heard on 28th January 2021.
III.In view of the Ministry of Health directives on the safeguards to be observed to stem the spread of the current COVID-19 pandemic, this Court shall hear and determine the Applicant’s Chamber Summons dated 15th December 2020 on the basis of the electronic copies of the pleadings and the written submissions filed by the parties.
IV.The parties shall file their pleadings and submissions electronically, by filing them with the Judiciary e-filing system, and send copies by electronic mail to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.com and asunachristine51@gmail.com.
V.The service of pleadings and documents directed by the Court shall be by way of personal service andelectronic mail, and in the case of service by way of electronic mail, the parties shall also email a copy of the documents so served to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies toasunachristine51@gmail.com.
VI.The parties shall also be required to file and send to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division their respective affidavits of service evidencing personal service, by way of electronic mail tojudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies toasunachristine51@gmail.com.
VII.The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall put this matter on the Division’s causelist for hearing on28th January 2021.
VIII. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling to the Applicant by electronic mail by close of business onThursday,24th December 2020.
IX.Parties shall be at liberty to apply.
7. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2020
P. NYAMWEYA
JUDGE