[2024] KEHC 10081 (KLR)
The High Court found that the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board's decision to order a fresh technical evaluation of all tenders, including those whose disqualification was uncontested, was irrational and unreasonable. The Board's own findings confirmed that only one tenderer (the applicant) met the technical criteria, and the other disqualified tenderers did not object to their exclusion. Subjecting all to a fresh evaluation, therefore, served no logical purpose and defied reasonableness. Furthermore, the Board's order mandating due diligence was ultra vires, as section 83(1) of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act leaves this to the procuring entity's discretion,...
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 10081 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; Respondent: Accounting Officer Nuclear Power and Energy Action (NUPEA); Interested Party: Iansoft Technologies Limited; Exparte: Green Com Enterprise Solutions Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2024
- Case Number
- Application E148 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Order of certiorari granted quashing the Board's decision. Procurement process to proceed in line with the letter of notification dated 17 May 2024. Each party to bear its own costs.
- Judges
- J Ngaah
- Legal Topics
- Public Procurement Review, Judicial Review Remedies, Procedural Fairness, Irrationality and Illegality, Tender Evaluation, Natural Justice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Public Procurement Administrative Review Board
Respondent
Accounting Officer Nuclear Power and Energy Action (NUPEA)
Respondent
Iansoft Technologies Limited
Interested Party
Green Com Enterprise Solutions Limited
Exparte
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board's decision to order a fresh technical evaluation of all tenders was irrational and unreasonable.
- 2 Whether the Board acted ultra vires by mandating due diligence contrary to the discretionary provisions of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act.
- 3 Whether the Board's decision was tainted by procedural impropriety for introducing new grounds without affording the applicant a hearing.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board's decision to order a fresh technical evaluation of all tenders, including those whose disqualification was uncontested, was irrational and unreasonable. The Board's own findings confirmed that only one tenderer (the applicant) met the technical criteria, and the other disqualified tenderers did not object to their exclusion. Subjecting all to a fresh evaluation, therefore, served no logical purpose and defied reasonableness. Furthermore, the Board's order mandating due diligence was ultra vires, as section 83(1) of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act leaves this to the procuring entity's discretion,...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Order of certiorari granted quashing the Board's decision. Procurement process to proceed in line with the letter of notification dated 17 May 2024. Each party to bear its own costs.
Orders
- An order of certiorari is granted quashing the decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board dated 21 June 2024 in PPARB Application No. 49 of 2024.
- The 2nd respondent may proceed and conclude the procurement proceedings for Tender No. NuPEA/OT/DICT/004/23-24 in line with the letter of notification to award dated 17 May 2024.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment