[2025] KEHC 8564 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 8564 (KLR)

The court found that the application for leave to apply for judicial review was not frivolous and was arguable on its face. The applicant had approached the court within the statutory time limit, and the issues raised warranted further consideration. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 8564 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; Applicant: Tramex Mediquip Limited; Interested Party: Chief Executive Officer, Kenya Medical Supplies Authority; Interested Party: Kenya Medical Supplies Authority; Interested Party: Suken International Limited; Interested Party: Quest Pharmaceuticals Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application E161 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review; Interlocutory Ruling
Outcome
Leave to apply for judicial review granted; leave to operate as stay of further proceedings regarding the tender; no order as to costs.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Public Procurement Review, Leave for Judicial Review, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Public Procurement Review Leave for Judicial Review Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Public Procurement Administrative Review Board

Respondent

Tramex Mediquip Limited

Applicant

Chief Executive Officer, Kenya Medical Supplies Authority

Interested Party

Kenya Medical Supplies Authority

Interested Party

Suken International Limited

Interested Party

Quest Pharmaceuticals Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review; Interlocutory Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition against the decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board.
  2. 2 Whether the leave granted should operate as a stay of further proceedings or actions regarding the award of the tender.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for leave to apply for judicial review was not frivolous and was arguable on its face. The applicant had approached the court within the statutory time limit, and the issues raised warranted further consideration. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to the applicant to file and serve an application for judicial review orders. Furthermore, the court directed that the leave so granted would operate as a stay of further proceedings or actions in regard to the award of the tender, including execution of any contract with the 3rd and 4th Interested Parties, pending the hearing and determination of the substantive motion. The...

Court Disposition

Leave to apply for judicial review granted; leave to operate as stay of further proceedings regarding the tender; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file and serve an application for judicial review orders as sought in the chamber summons dated 16/6/2025.
  • The main motion to be filed in a fresh file by close of business today.