[2020] KEHC 5822 (KLR)
The court found that Pottermark Enterprises, having lodged the complaint that triggered the procurement investigations under challenge, had a direct and substantial interest in the proceedings. However, since no relief was sought against it by the ex parte Applicant, it could not be joined as a respondent. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 5822 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Public Procurement Regulatory Authority; Interested Party: Kenya Bureau of Standards; Interested Party: Naivana Agencies Limited; Interested Party: Pottermark Enterprises; Applicant: EAA Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Application 88 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Application for Joinder of Party
- Outcome
- Pottermark Enterprises joined as 3rd Interested Party; application for joinder as respondent declined; directions for electronic service and further conduct of proceedings issued.
- Judges
- P Nyamweya
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Joinder of Parties, Public Procurement, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Public Procurement Regulatory Authority
Respondent
Kenya Bureau of Standards
Interested Party
Naivana Agencies Limited
Interested Party
Pottermark Enterprises
Interested Party
EAA Company Limited
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Application for Joinder of Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Pottermark Enterprises should be joined as a necessary party in the judicial review proceedings.
- 2 Whether the Proposed Respondent can be joined as a respondent or only as an interested party.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Pottermark Enterprises, having lodged the complaint that triggered the procurement investigations under challenge, had a direct and substantial interest in the proceedings. However, since no relief was sought against it by the ex parte Applicant, it could not be joined as a respondent. The court held that Pottermark Enterprises was a necessary party for the just determination of the issues and should be joined as an interested party, with participation limited accordingly. The court also issued directions for electronic service and filing in light of COVID-19 restrictions, to facilitate expeditious and fair hearing of the matter.
Court Disposition
Pottermark Enterprises joined as 3rd Interested Party; application for joinder as respondent declined; directions for electronic service and further conduct of proceedings issued.
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 12th May 2020 is certified urgent and admitted ex parte.
- Pottermark Enterprises is joined as the 3rd Interested Party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
39 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2020
JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC................................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY...........RESPONDENT
AND
KENYA BUREAU OF STANDARDS............................1ST INTERESTED PARTY
NAIVANA AGENCIES LIMITED................................2ND INTERESTED PARTY
POTTERMARK ENTERPRISES.....PROPOSED RESPONDENT/APPLICANT
EX PARTE: EAA COMPANY LIMITED
RULING NO. 3
1. Pottermark Limited (hereinafter “the Proposed Respondent”), has filed an application by way of a Notice of Motion dated 12th May 2020, seeking orders that it be joined as a necessary party and Respondent in the instant proceedings, and that it be allowed to respond to the ex parte Applicant’s substantive Notice of Motion. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn on the same date by John Kenneth Mugambi, the Proposed Respondent’s sole proprietor.
2. The main grounds for the application are that the intended Respondent was a party in the bidding process which is the subject of these proceedings and can shed some light on the procurement process herein. Furthermore, that the Proposed Respondent is closely connected with these proceedings, as it raised a complaint to the Respondent, which gave rise to the investigations that are challenged herein by the ex parte Applicant. The Proposed Respondent detailed out the gist of its complaint, and annexed copies of correspondence with the Respondent in this regard.
3. As this is an application that seeks to join a party who claims to be directly affected, and therefore a necessary party in this suit within the meaning of Order 53 Rule 3 (2) and (4) of the Civil Procedure Rules, I find that the application can be heard ex parte. In addition, the Proposed Respondent has provided evidence of the complaints it made to the Respondent leading to the investigations that are impugned in these proceedings by the ex parte Applicant. Therefore, to the extent that it has a grievance and interest in the investigations by the Respondent having been the complainant therein, it is a necessary party in the instant proceedings.
4. However, as there is no decision or action by the Proposed Respondent that is the subject of the orders sought by the ex parte Applicant, it cannot be joined as a Respondent herein, and can only be joined as an Interested Party, with its participation limited as such. Lastly, as court operations have now been scaled down due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases are now being heard remotely by way of electronic means, the joinder of the Proposed Respondent at this stage shall expedite the hearing of this matter.
5. In the circumstances, I hereby direct and order as follows:
I. The Notice of Motion application dated 12th May 2020 is certified urgent and is admitted to hearing ex parte.
II. Pottermark Enterprises is hereby joined to this suit as the 3rd Interested Party.
III. The ex parte Applicant shall serve the 3rd Interested Party with the substantive Notice of Motion, and the Chamber Summons dated 28th April 2020 and its supporting documents within seven (7) days of service of this ruling.
IV. Upon being served with the said pleadings, the 3rd Interested Party shall be required to file its response to the substantive Notice of Motion within seven (7) days from the date of service.
V. This matter shall be mentioned on 8th June 2020 for further directions.
VI. The costs of the Notice of Motion dated 12th May 2020 shall be in the cause.
VII. In view of the Ministry of Health directives on the safeguards to be observed to stem the spread of the current COVID-19 pandemic, this Court shall hear the ex parte Applicant’s substantiveNotice of Motionon the basis of the electronic copies of the pleadings and written submissions filed by the parties.
VIII. The parties shall file their pleadings, applications and written submissions electronically by sending them to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies to asunachristine51@gmail.com,and shall avail electronic copies thereof in word format.
IX. The electronic copies of pleadings and documents sent by the parties shall be clearly and correctly titled to indicate the J.R Case Number, the name of the Party sending it (that is whether the Ex Parte Applicant, Respondent or Interested Party), and the nature of the pleading or document.
X. The service of pleadings and documents directed by the Court shall be by way of personal service andelectronic mail, and in the case of service by way of electronic mail, the parties shall also email a copy of the documents so served to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies to asunachristine51@gmail.com.
XI. The parties shall also be required to send to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division their respective affidavits of service evidencing personal service, by way of electronic mail tojudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies to asunachristine51@gmail.com.
XII. The Deputy Registrar ofthe Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of these directions and the extracted orders to the ex parte Applicant and Respondent’s counsel by electronic mail by close of business on Monday, 18th May 2020.
XIII. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall put this matter on the Division’s causelist for mention on 8th June 2020and bring it to the attention of a Judge in the Division on that date for directions.
XIV. The 3rd Interested Party shall serve the ex parte Applicant, Respondent, and 1st and 2nd Interested Parties with its Notice of Motion dated 12th May 2020, a copy of this ruling, and a mention notice within seven (7) days from today’s date.
XV. Parties shall be at liberty to apply.
6. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 18TH DAY OF MAY 2020
P. NYAMWEYA
JUDGE