[2011] KEHC 4230 (KLR)

[2011] KEHC 4230 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants were given notice of the allegations against them and an opportunity to respond, thus satisfying the requirements of natural justice. The court held that the person who signed the dismissal and retirement letters acted under proper administrative delegation from the Permanent...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] KEHC 4230 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Public Service Commission; Respondent: Permanent Secretary, Provincial Administration & Internal Security; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General; Applicant: Benjamin Kipkirui Chepkwony; Applicant: Joseph Kiplangat Sang; Applicant: Ledama Koila; Applicant: Shadrack Kiplangat Kirui
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
31 January 2011
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 847 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion for Judicial Review
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondents
Judges
DK Musinga
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Public Service Discipline, Natural Justice, Ultra Vires Actions
Source Language
english
Administrative Law Employment and Labour Judicial Review Public Service Discipline Natural Justice Ultra Vires Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Public Service Commission

Respondent

Permanent Secretary, Provincial Administration & Internal Security

Respondent

Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Benjamin Kipkirui Chepkwony

Applicant

Joseph Kiplangat Sang

Applicant

Ledama Koila

Applicant

Shadrack Kiplangat Kirui

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants were denied the right to be heard before disciplinary action was taken against them.
  2. 2 Whether the decisions to dismiss or retire the applicants were made ultra vires the powers of the Public Service Commission or its officers.
  3. 3 Whether the person who signed the dismissal/retirement letters was authorized under the Public Service Commission Regulations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants were given notice of the allegations against them and an opportunity to respond, thus satisfying the requirements of natural justice. The court held that the person who signed the dismissal and retirement letters acted under proper administrative delegation from the Permanent Secretary, and there was no irregularity in the process. The Public Service Commission was within its powers to make the disciplinary decisions, as the Regulations allow the Commission to perform functions otherwise vested in authorized officers. The court reiterated that judicial review is limited to examining the legality and fairness of the decision-making process, not the...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondents

Orders

  • The amended notice of motion is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondents.