[2016] KEHC 2513 (KLR)
The court found that, despite the respondent's guilty plea to the charge of being unlawfully present in Kenya, subsequent evidence established that he is a bona fide Kenyan citizen. The documentation provided by the Immigration Department, including fingerprint records and a confirmation letter, demonstrated that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 2513 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Rashid Hussein Kojira
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 42 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Review of Deportation Order
- Outcome
- deportation order set aside; respondent to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Immigration Offences, Deportation Orders, Citizenship Status
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Rashid Hussein Kojira
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Review of Deportation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deportation order against the respondent was lawful given new evidence of his Kenyan citizenship.
- 2 Whether the High Court should exercise its revisionary powers to set aside the deportation order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, despite the respondent's guilty plea to the charge of being unlawfully present in Kenya, subsequent evidence established that he is a bona fide Kenyan citizen. The documentation provided by the Immigration Department, including fingerprint records and a confirmation letter, demonstrated that the respondent was not unlawfully present in Kenya. Therefore, the deportation order issued by the trial court was made in error. Exercising its revisionary jurisdiction under Section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court set aside the deportation order as it was not legally sustainable against a Kenyan citizen.
Court Disposition
deportation order set aside; respondent to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The deportation order made by the trial court on 9/3/2016 is set aside.
- The accused is to be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
REVISION NO. 42 OF 2016
REPUBLIC …………………….…. APPLICANT
VERSUS
RASHID HUSSEIN KOJIRA….. RESPONDENT
(Revision from the Conviction of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Nakuru, Hon. E. Kelly– Resident Magistrate delivered on the 9th day of March 2016 in Cr. Case No. 803 of 2015)
RULING
The accused herein RASHID HUSSEIN KOJIRA was on 10/4/2015 charged before the Nakuru Chief Magistrate’s Court with the offence of BEING UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN KENYA contrary to Section 53(I) (J) of the KENYA CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ACT, 2011, LAWS OF KENYA. The accused initially pleaded ‘Not Guilty’to the charge.
However on 9/3/2016 when the matter came up before HON. E. KELLY - Resident Magistrate the accused changed plea to one of ‘Guilty’. He was dealt with procedurally and was sentenced to a fine of Ksh 50,000/= in default to serve six (6) months imprisonment. The court also directed that the applicant be deported back to Somalia upon completion of his sentence.
When the accused completed his sentence he was handed over to the Immigration Department for the deportation order to be carried out. By way of their letter dated 30/9/2016 and filed in this court on even date, the officer in charge of Immigration, South Rift Region has notified the court that upon further enquiry it has emerged that the accused is in actual fact a Kenyan Citizen. They seek a review of the deportation order.
I have perused the documents annexed to that letter. They include copies of the accused’s finger-prints as well as a letter dated 14/7/2016 confirming that the accused is a bonafide Kenyan Citizen from the Rendile Community. Based on the documentation annexed, it is clear that despite his guilty plea the accused is not in Kenya unlawfully.
In the circumstances, I do exercise the High Court powers of review granted under Section 392 of the Criminal Procedure Code and I hereby set aside the Deportation Order made by the trial court on 9/3/3016. The accused is to be set at liberty forthwith unless he is otherwise lawfully held.
Dated in Nakuru this 30th day of September 2016.
Maureen Odero
Judge