[2021] KEHC 7444 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7444 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the respondent acted unlawfully or that the procurement process was tainted by illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety. The application did not meet the threshold for the grant of judicial review remedies. Consequently, the application was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7444 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; Defendant: Consortium of Rentco Africa Ltd; Defendant: Pharmaken
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Public Procurement, Dismissal of Application
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Public Procurement Dismissal of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Public Procurement Administrative Review Board

Respondent

Consortium of Rentco Africa Ltd

Defendant

Pharmaken

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judicial review orders against the respondent in relation to the procurement process.
  2. 2 Whether the application meets the threshold for grant of judicial review remedies.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the respondent acted unlawfully or that the procurement process was tainted by illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety. The application did not meet the threshold for the grant of judicial review remedies. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs to the respondent and the 1st Interested Party.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The applicant's application is dismissed with costs to the respondent and the 1st Interested Party.
  • Reasons for the ruling to be delivered on 12/5/2021.