[2019] KEELRC 1464 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1464 (KLR)

The court found that the 4th Interested Party's application for review and enjoinment did not meet the threshold set out in Rule 33 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016. The grounds advanced by the applicants—alleged error on the record, exclusion from proceedings, and prejudice—did...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1464 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Retirement Benefits Appeal Tribunal; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: Retirement Benefits Authority; Interested Party: Boniface Mariga and 948 Others; Interested Party: Gideon Mburu Ng'ang'a and 176 Others; Interested Party: Ben Oulo and 135 Others; Exparte Applicant: Board of Trustees, Teleposta Pension Scheme
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 36 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Application for Review and Enjoinment
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Procedure, Review of Court Orders, Joinder of Parties, Pension Disputes
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Judicial Review Procedure Review of Court Orders Joinder of Parties Pension Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Retirement Benefits Appeal Tribunal

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Retirement Benefits Authority

Interested Party

Boniface Mariga and 948 Others

Interested Party

Gideon Mburu Ng'ang'a and 176 Others

Interested Party

Ben Oulo and 135 Others

Interested Party

Board of Trustees, Teleposta Pension Scheme

Exparte Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Application for Review and Enjoinment

  1. 1 Whether the 4th Interested Party's application for review and enjoinment meets the threshold under Rule 33 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have established grounds for review, including discovery of new evidence, error on the face of the record, or other sufficient reason.
  3. 3 Whether the existence of a pending appeal precludes the grant of review.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 4th Interested Party's application for review and enjoinment did not meet the threshold set out in Rule 33 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016. The grounds advanced by the applicants—alleged error on the record, exclusion from proceedings, and prejudice—did not constitute discovery of new evidence, error apparent on the face of the record, or any other sufficient reason as required for review. The court further held that the existence of a pending appeal against the decision of Nyamweya J. precluded the grant of review, as review is only available where no appeal has been preferred. Additionally, the applicants failed to attach the...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application by the 4th Interested Party for review and enjoinment is dismissed.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.