[2020] KEHC 8784 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence through the testimony of eight witnesses, including eyewitness accounts directly implicating the accused persons in the assault and subsequent burning of the deceased. The evidence, if believed, would be sufficient to establish the elements of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 8784 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Richard Ndwiga Wambugu; Defendant: Peter Kinyua Kangichu; Defendant: Joseph Kariuki Ndwiga; Defendant: Joseph Njeru Ndwiga; Defendant: Nancy Wangiri
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 22 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- All accused persons found to have a case to answer and are called upon to make their defences.
- Judges
- FN Muchemi
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Richard Ndwiga Wambugu
Defendant
Peter Kinyua Kangichu
Defendant
Joseph Kariuki Ndwiga
Defendant
Joseph Njeru Ndwiga
Defendant
Nancy Wangiri
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant putting them on their defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence adduced links the accused persons to the offence of murder as charged.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence through the testimony of eight witnesses, including eyewitness accounts directly implicating the accused persons in the assault and subsequent burning of the deceased. The evidence, if believed, would be sufficient to establish the elements of the offence of murder as charged. Consequently, the court held that a prima facie case had been made out against all five accused persons, warranting that they be put on their defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
All accused persons found to have a case to answer and are called upon to make their defences.
Orders
- All accused persons are found to have a case to answer.
- All accused persons are hereby called upon to make their defences.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 22 OF 2014
REPUBLIC..........................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
RICHARD NDWIGA WAMBUGU............................................ACCUSED
PETER KINYUA KANGICHU...................................................ACCUSED
JOSEPH KARIUKI NDWIGA....................................................ACCUSED
JOSEPH NJERU NDWIGA.........................................................ACCUSED
NANCY WANGIRI.......................................................................ACCUSED
RULING
A. Introduction
1. This is a ruling on whether the accused persons herein have a case to answer and should consequently be put on their defence.
2. The accused herein are jointly charged with the offence of murder of Jackson Kariuki Namu contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence are that on the 29/03/2014, at Ngenge village, Gaturi sub-location within Embu County, jointly with others not before court murdered Jackson Kariuki Namu. The accused persons all pleaded not-guilty to the charge.
3. The prosecution called eight (8) witnesses in support of their case which is summarised herein.
B. Prosecution Case
4. The prosecution case was that on the 29/03/2014 at around 5. 00pm PW1 received a call from her mother, PW2, informing her that the deceased, her brother, and the 2nd accused who was her uncle had quarrelled. She proceeded to Ngenge village where she found the deceased kneeling down with injuries on the head. She testified that there was a group of people around him including the 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th accused armed with various weapons who beat the deceased.
5. PW1 testified the 3rd accused hit the deceased on the head with a piece of wood whereas the 4th accused hit the deceased on the head with an axe. She further testified that the 4th accused then asked the deceased’s father what to do with the deceased to which he replied “just finish him” and subsequently threw a matchbox to the 1st accused. PW1 testified that the 3rd accused the collected dry maize stocks, dry banana leaves and put them on the deceased as he lay on the ground after which the 1st accused poured paraffin on the deceased and set him on fire.
6. The facts of the case is that PW1 was informed that the deceased and his uncle the 2nd accused had quarrelled. He proceeded to Ngenge village where he found the deceased kneeling down with injuries and being assaulted by the 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th accused persons. He was later set on fire.
7. The deceased later died of the injuries inflicted on him as the accused persons were arrested and later charged with the offence.
8. I have carefully perused the entire evidence in this case and I am satisfied that the prosecution have made up a prima facie case against the five accused.
9. I find that all the accused persons have a case to answer and are hereby called upon to make their defences.
10. It is hereby so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU THIS 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2020.
F. MUCHEMI
JUDGE
In the presence of: -
Mr. Momanyi for 1st – 4th Accused
Mr. Ithiga for 5th Accused
1st – 5th Accused