[2014] KEHC 1969 (KLR)
The court found that the accused's act of hitting the deceased on the head with a stick or fencing pole was not accidental and that the provocation was not serious enough to justify the act. The court considered the circumstances of the case, the accused's time in custody (1½ years), and the probation officer's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 1969 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Richard Sambu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 8 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling
- Outcome
- convicted of manslaughter; sentenced to three years, split between imprisonment and probation
- Judges
- HI Ong'udi
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing, Plea Bargaining, Provocation, Custodial Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Richard Sambu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was guilty of murder or manslaughter based on the facts and plea bargain.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the offence of manslaughter in the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused's act of hitting the deceased on the head with a stick or fencing pole was not accidental and that the provocation was not serious enough to justify the act. The court considered the circumstances of the case, the accused's time in custody (1½ years), and the probation officer's report recommending probation. Balancing these factors, the court determined that a sentence of three years was appropriate, with the first eighteen months to be served in prison and the remaining eighteen months on probation. This approach reflects both the seriousness of the offence and the mitigating factors present.
Court Disposition
convicted of manslaughter; sentenced to three years, split between imprisonment and probation
Orders
- Accused to serve the first eighteen (18) months in prison (imprisonment).
- The remaining eighteen (18) months to be served on probation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KERICHO
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 8 OF 2013
REPUBLIC....................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
RICHARD SAMBU..............................................ACCUSED
RULING ON SENTENCE
This offence occurred on 13/2/2013 at 6. 00pm. Accused was charged with murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code and was later convicted of Manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code after a plea bargaining arrangement. The facts indeed confirm that there was a misunderstanding between the accused and the deceased. Despite the fact that the deceased had a panga, there is no evidence that he used it against the accused. Even the allegation of stones having been thrown at the accused is neither here nor there as he was never injured by any of the stones. The hitting of the deceased on the head by the accused using a stick or fencing pole was uncalled for. It was not what one would call accidental, and the provocation was not that serious. The Probation Report recommends Probation. I have considered
i. The circumstances of the case,
ii. The 1½ years the accused has been in custody.
iii. The social report by the Probation Officer.
In my opinion a sentence of three (3) years is appropriate but on the following conditions.
1. Accused will serve the first eighteen (18) months in Prison (imprisonment).
2. The remaining eighteen (18) months will be served on probation.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court this 10th day of November, 2014.
...................
H. ONG'UDI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
M/s Munyolo for State
M/s Ong'anyi for accused
Rotich- court assistant