[2009] KEHC 748 (KLR)
The court found that the accused, Robert Cheruiyot, inflicted a serious injury on the deceased during a quarrel over trespass, using a panga. The injury was medically confirmed as the cause of death, which occurred within 17 days of the incident. The court considered but rejected the defence of provocation and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 748 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Robert Cheruiyot
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 38 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- guilty of murder
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Causation of Death, Provocation, Intoxication, Grievous Harm
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Robert Cheruiyot
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully caused the death of the deceased, amounting to murder.
- 2 Whether the accused was provoked or intoxicated, thereby reducing culpability.
- 3 Whether the injuries inflicted by the accused were the direct cause of the deceased's death.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused, Robert Cheruiyot, inflicted a serious injury on the deceased during a quarrel over trespass, using a panga. The injury was medically confirmed as the cause of death, which occurred within 17 days of the incident. The court considered but rejected the defence of provocation and intoxication, finding no sufficient evidence to support these claims. The accused's silence on the incident in his defence and the lack of a history of provocation led the court to conclude that the accused unlawfully caused the deceased's death with malice aforethought. The court held that the prosecution had proved the charge of murder beyond reasonable doubt and found the accused...
Court Disposition
guilty of murder
Orders
- The accused is found guilty of murder as charged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO
Criminal Case 38 of 2008
REPUBLIC ………………………………………..PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
ROBERT CHERUIYOT ……………………………… ACCUSED
JUDGMENT
I: Background
1. On the 29th September, 2008 PW3 Bernard Kiplangat Kimetto was walking along heading to Litein when at about 4. 00p.m he heard two persons quarrelling. He looked as he passed by and over heard that the quarrel was over trespass. The accused one Robert Cheruiyot was threatening the deceased one Daniel Kipronoh Tanui not to pass through the land he was in.
2. As the quarrel hightened the accused who held a cutless (panga) in his hand struck the deceased who fell down. The accused ran away and the deceased was lying on the ground bleeding from his head where he had been cut to the side.
3. The deceased was taken to a clinic and afterwards to the Hospital at Kericho. He was looked after with his brother PW1 David Too at his side. On 6th October, 2008 succumbed to his injuries and died in Eldoret where he had been referred for further treatment at the hospital there.
4. The accused had by now been arrested with the offence of causing Grievous Harm as stated in the Penal Code when the deceased passed away he was recharged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the penal code.
5. That on the 25th September, 2008 at Kaplelwo village Kiptere location in Kericho District of Rift Valley Province he murdered Daniel Kiprotich Tanui.
6. The accused pleaded not guilty. He was taken for mental assessment and found to be normal.
7. In his defence (unsworn) he stated that he had been arrested and first beaten. He mentions nothing of the incident that occurred.
8. The state submitted that they have proved their case before court beyond a reasonable doubt. The advocate for the defence stated the accused was intoxicated and could have been provoked to commit the offence.
III: Opinion
9. The prosecutions have established that the deceased was inflicted with an injury sustained as a result of being assaulted by the accused. They further called evidence of a nurse PW2 Andrew Kipkoirr who treated the deceased on the same day of 25. 9.08. He stated that the deceased was bleeding heavily as a result that he actually was in a very serious condition. The injuries sustained was to the side of his skull.
10. DR. Wekesa Nyalo attached to the Moi Referral Hospital conducted a post mortem on the deceased. He described the deceased as a male adult aged 31 years old. He had a healed scar on the side of the head. He confirmed the trauma to the said left side of the head resulting to the death of the deceased.
11. The death of the deceased having been so established did this amount to murder?
12. It is trite law that when one is inflicted injury does not die immediately the law would term murder where such a person dies within 12 months and a day. In this case the deceased died on 6. 10. 08 almost 17 days later.
13. If the deceased had died 12 months and a day thereafter then the inflicting of such injury would not be termed as murder.
14. I have herein noted that the accused stated nothing on the case in his defence save that he was beaten. The advocate for accused stated from the bar that the accused was provoked. There was evidence the deceased was intoxicated.
15. The fact though remains in my opinion is that the deceased was not harmed. There was no motive of provocation save an issue of trespass where no history that this occurred every day to provoke the accused who mentions nothing of this.
16. I accordingly find the deceased was inflicted injury by the accused causing him Grievous Harm. That this injury later causing his death amounts to Murder. I find the accused guilty as charged.
DATED this 9th day of June, 2009 at KERICHO
M.A. ANG’AWA
JUDGE
Advocates
R.K. Koech Senior State Counsel instructed by the Attorney General for the State – present
W.R. Kiprono advocate instructed by the firm of M/S W.R. Kiprono & Co. advocates for the accused – present
Accused – present
27th July, 2009
Note for file
Offender died two weeks later in prison custody but at the District Hospital at Kericho.
Inquiry file order to be opened. Section 387 Criminal Procedure Code applies.
M.A. ANG’AWA
JUDGE