[2019] KEHC 5464 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called five witnesses, established a prima facie case against Robert Gitonga and Jane Karambo for the murder of Raki Muriithi. The evidence presented was deemed sufficient to require the accused persons to be placed on their defence in accordance with the law. The court therefore ruled that both accused have a case to answer and should proceed to present their defence.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 5464 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Robert Gitonga; Defendant: Jane Karambo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2019
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 68 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused persons found to have a case to answer and ordered to be placed on their defence.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Robert Gitonga
Defendant
Jane Karambo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant their being placed on their defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence tendered by the prosecution is sufficient to require the accused to answer to the charge of murder.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called five witnesses, established a prima facie case against Robert Gitonga and Jane Karambo for the murder of Raki Muriithi. The evidence presented was deemed sufficient to require the accused persons to be placed on their defence in accordance with the law. The court therefore ruled that both accused have a case to answer and should proceed to present their defence.
Court Disposition
Accused persons found to have a case to answer and ordered to be placed on their defence.
Orders
- Both accused persons to be placed on their defence.
- Defence hearing scheduled for 30th September 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment