[2022] KEHC 2398 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused, as the evidence presented did not directly link him to the murder of the deceased. The absence of the accused from the home and his status as a fellow fisherman were insufficient to infer guilt. The court emphasized that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 2398 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Robert Ochieng Ogallo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 9 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Acquittal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Robert Ochieng Ogallo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on No Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether suspicion alone is sufficient to warrant putting the accused on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused, as the evidence presented did not directly link him to the murder of the deceased. The absence of the accused from the home and his status as a fellow fisherman were insufficient to infer guilt. The court emphasized that suspicion, however strong, cannot substitute for proof beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused was acquitted under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, as there was no evidence upon which a reasonable tribunal could convict if the accused chose to remain silent.
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- The accused, Robert Ochieng Ogallo, is acquitted of the offence of murder under section 306(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- He is set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT HOMA BAY
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 9 OF 2018
REPUBLIC..........................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
ROBERT OCHIENG OGALLO..............................................ACCUSED
RULING
1. Robert Ochieng Ogallo is charged with an offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. The particulars of the offence are that on the night of 17th & 18th day of February, 2018, at Kanam B location, Rachuonyo North Sub County within Homa Bay County, murdered Jackline Adhiambo Ogallo.
3. The evidence of the witnesses that were called did not link the accused to the offence of murder of the deceased herein.
4. In his evidence, Daniel Omondi Apiyo (PW1) testified that when the body of the deceased was discovered and he went to the home, he did not find the accused at the home. He further told the court that the accused was a fellow fisherman. This alone would not form a basis for investigation against the accused. How many villagers were not at the home? We equally know that suspicion alone however strong cannot be a basis for concluding that one is guilty. The Court of Appeal in the case of Sawe vs. Republic[2003] KLR 354, held as follows:
Suspicion, however strong, cannot provide the basis of inferring guilt which must be proved by evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
5. After considering the evidence on record, the question is whether the prosecution has establish a prima facie caseagainst the accused person.In the Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th Editionprimafacie case is defined as follows:
Prima facie case. (1805) I. The establishment of a legally required rebuttable presumption. 2. A party's production of enough evidence to allow the fact-trier to infer the fact at issue and rule in the party's favor.
6. The Court of appeal in the case of Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt v. R [1957] E.A 332 at 334 and 335, defined prima facie case as follows:
It may not be easy to define what is meant by a “prima facie case”, but at least it must mean one on which a reasonable tribunal, properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence.
7. Article 50 (2) (i) of the Constitution of Kenya provides:
(2) Every accused person has the right to a fair trial, which includes the right—
(i) to remain silent, and not to testify during the proceedings;
In the instant case, if the accused person opts to exercise his constitutional right hereinabove stated, I cannot enter a conviction based on the evidence on record. This therefore means that the prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case against him. I accordingly acquit him of the offence of murder under section 306 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. He is set at liberty unless if otherwise lawfully held.
DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT HOMA BAY THIS 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
JUDGE