[2013] KEHC 4672 (KLR)
The court declined to grant bail to the accused at this stage, primarily because the incident was recent, occurred in a public place during a drinking spree, and the accused allegedly went into hiding after the incident. The court found that granting bail could send the wrong message to potential witnesses and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 4672 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Royford Kirimi Mbuba
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 18 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Application for Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- bail denied
- Judges
- JW Lessit
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Murder Charge, Judicial Discretion on Bail
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Royford Kirimi Mbuba
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Application for Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be granted bail pending trial for a murder charge.
- 2 Whether the accused's status as a police officer affects the bail decision.
- 3 Whether the circumstances of the offence and its impact on witnesses and victims' relatives justify denial of bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to grant bail to the accused at this stage, primarily because the incident was recent, occurred in a public place during a drinking spree, and the accused allegedly went into hiding after the incident. The court found that granting bail could send the wrong message to potential witnesses and the victim's relatives, possibly undermining confidence in the judicial process. The accused's status as a police officer and the lack of a pre-bail report were also considered, but the overriding concern was the public perception and the need to maintain the integrity of the proceedings. The court left open the possibility for the accused to renew the bail application at a later...
Court Disposition
bail denied
Orders
- Bail is declined for the accused at this stage.
- The accused may renew the application for bail at a later stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Meru
Criminal Case 18 of 2013 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]
REPUBLIC......................................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
ROYFORD KIRIMI MBUBA....................................................................ACCUSED
RULING
This is an application for bail/bond pending trial. It was made on behalf of the accused by Mr. Mugo Advocate. The counsel urged that the accused person is an Administration Police Officer and that he was unlikely to abscond. He submitted that the accused was ready to abide by the terms given by the court and that he was keen to have the matter heard fully so that he does not lose his job.
The State was represented by Mr. Moses Mungai, the learned State Counsel.Mr. Mungai submitted that the State was not opposed to bail. He said that the Investigating Officer advised him that the accused was an Administration Police. Counsel submitted that the accused was arrested at his place of work a month after the incident. Counsel urged that there are no exceptional circumstances to oppose bail.
I have carefully considered this application and the submissions by both counsels. The accused is facing a charge of murder. He was arrested this year for this offence which happened in December last year. There is no pre-bail report and given the fact that the accused is a Police Officer and that the incident happened where he is deployed, a home report would not have been helpful in the circumstances.
I have considered that the accused person is a Police Officer and the fact that this incident occurred at a bar where he was drinking. It was not therefore, an incident that occurred in the cause of his official duty. According to the Arresting Officers statement the accused went into hiding after this incident contrary to the State Counsel’s submissions.It is my view that because the incident is still very fresh in the minds of all parties involved; and given the circumstances that it occurred in a public place during a drinking spree it is my view that it is not advisable to consider this application for bail at this stage as it may send the wrong message to the potential witnesses and to the relatives of the victim. They may think that the serious circumstances of the incident had either been overlooked or trashed by the court.
In all the circumstances of this case I find it will not be proper to grant bail now. I decline to grant bail to the accused person. That does not stop him from renewing this application at a later stage of this case..
SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH , 2013.
J. LESIIT
JUDGE