[2021] KEHC 3221 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 3221 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution, through the testimony of eleven witnesses, presented sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused persons for the offence of murder. The evidence, if believed, could support a conviction. Therefore, the accused persons are required to be put on their...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 3221 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Salim Kalimbo Nyawa alias Msanii; Defendant: Ernest Urunzi Murabu alias Ndegwa; Defendant: Mwanaidi Chimako
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 3 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Outcome
case to answer found; accused persons to be put on their defence
Legal Topics
Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Prima Facie Case Criminal Procedure Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Salim Kalimbo Nyawa alias Msanii

Defendant

Ernest Urunzi Murabu alias Ndegwa

Defendant

Mwanaidi Chimako

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons to warrant them being put on their defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution, through the testimony of eleven witnesses, presented sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused persons for the offence of murder. The evidence, if believed, could support a conviction. Therefore, the accused persons are required to be put on their defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court did not make any findings on the credibility or weight of the evidence at this stage, as the purpose of the ruling is solely to determine whether the prosecution has made out a case requiring an answer from the accused.

Court Disposition

case to answer found; accused persons to be put on their defence

Orders

  • The accused persons are found to have a case to answer and are hereby called upon to defend themselves.