[2017] KEHC 875 (KLR)
The court found that the 1st Accused, being a young first offender who had already spent three years in custody, acted without malice aforethought and was provoked by the deceased. The prolonged incarceration was due to systemic delays rather than the gravity of the offence. The court determined that a non-custodial...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 875 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Accused: Samuel Mboi Paul; Accused: Mwanzia Paul
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Voi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 14 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- 1st Accused sentenced to two months community service; 2nd Accused acquitted.
- Judges
- CM Kamau
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Manslaughter, Mitigation, Youthful Offenders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Samuel Mboi Paul
Accused
Mwanzia Paul
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st Accused should receive a custodial or non-custodial sentence for the offence committed.
- 2 Whether the time already spent in custody by the 1st Accused should be considered in sentencing.
- 3 Whether the circumstances of the offence, including provocation and lack of malice aforethought, mitigate the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 1st Accused, being a young first offender who had already spent three years in custody, acted without malice aforethought and was provoked by the deceased. The prolonged incarceration was due to systemic delays rather than the gravity of the offence. The court determined that a non-custodial sentence would be sufficient to serve the interests of justice, provide some reparation to the deceased's family, and facilitate the Accused's reintegration into society. The court distinguished the 1st Accused from the 2nd Accused, who was acquitted, and emphasized that a custodial sentence would be a miscarriage of justice under the circumstances.
Court Disposition
1st Accused sentenced to two months community service; 2nd Accused acquitted.
Orders
- 1st Accused to serve community service for two months at a centre determined by the Probation Office at Taveta Sub County.
- 1st Accused to be escorted forthwith to the Probation Office Taveta Sub County to comply with the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT VOI
CRIMINAL CASE NO 14 OF 2014
REPUBLIC
VERSUS
SAMUEL MBOI PAUL.................................................1ST ACCUSED
MWANZIA PAUL........................................................2ND ACCUSED
SENTENCING
1. I have heard the submissions by Mr Oduor for the 1st Accused person and Miss Anyumba for the State on the 1st Accused person’s mitigation. The 1st Accused person is a young man aged twenty four (24) years and must have been twenty one (21) years of age at the time of committing the offence. He is remorseful for what transpired on the material date.
2. Mr Oduor has pleaded with this court to consider a non – custodial sentence as the 1st Accused is a young man and the sole bread winner of his elderly parents. Counsel has urged this court to consider that we have a duty to integrate young people back into the society and that the 1st Accused person has already been in custody for three (3) years during which time he has had time to reflect on his actions.
3. On the other hand, Miss Anyumba has submitted that although the 1st Accused person was a young man who was not drunk and was fighting an elderly drunk man, he had a choice of walking away. He did not so do but instead engaged in a fight that led to the deceased’s death. She prayed that this court delivers justice to the deceased’s family.
4. I note that the Accused person has been in custody since 16th June 2014. It has been almost three (3) years since he appeared in court. He applied for bail which Kasanga J rejected on 11th June 2015. Her argument was that the 1st Accused person was at liberty to apply afresh after the close of the Prosecution case. The Prosecution case was closed on 10th February 2016 and it took almost nine (9) months before the 1st Accused person gave his defence leading to the delivery of judgment today.
5. In essence one can say that he has actually been incarcerated for three (3) years for an offence this court believes could have attracted imprisonment a lower sentence than three (3) years. However, due to the fact that there was no Resident Judge at the High Court of Kenya Voi, it has taken this long to hear and determine the case herein.
6. It is the view of this court that a lower sentence would have been sufficient to punish the 1st Accused person as he was young and impressionable and was likely to make poor choices especially under the influence of alcohol and after being provoked, by the deceased.
7. It would be a great travesty and miscarriage of justice to penalise him heavily. It is true that the deceased passed away but this was due to a fight. There was no malice aforethought on the part of the 1st Accused person and he actually did not run away from the scene of the incident. Instead, he assisted in placing the deceased at the verandah so that he could not be rained on. The deceased was an elderly man who also made bad choices by engaging in a fight with a young man.
8. Bearing in mind the circumstances of the case herein and the fact that the Accused person is a first offender, it is my considered view that a non-custodial sentence would be sufficient to give some reparation to the deceased family and also to set him apart from the 2nd Accused person who had also spent three (3) years in custody but who I have found not guilty of the offence of murder or manslaughter.
9. Accordingly, I hereby sentence the 1st Accused person to serve community service for a period of two (2) months at a centre to be determined by the Probation Office at Taveta Sub County. I hereby direct that the 1st Accused person be escorted forthwith to the Probation Office Taveta Sub County so as to comply with this order.
10. Orders accordingly.
DATED and DELIVERED at VOI this 4th day of MAY 2017
J. KAMAU
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Oduor holding brief for Mrs Isika – for Accused
Miss Anyumba - for State
Josephat Mavu – Court Clerk