[2019] KEHC 230 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had not established compelling reasons to deny the accused bail pending trial. The only concern raised was the proximity of the accused's home to that of the deceased, which could potentially lead to conflict. However, the court determined that such concerns could be adequately...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 230 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Samuel Omukuba Oyombera
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 5 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling
- Outcome
- bail_granted_with_conditions
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Compelling Reasons for Bail, Flight Risk, Witness Interference, Pre Bail Report, Murder Charge
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Samuel Omukuba Oyombera
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Bail Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to bail pending trial for a murder charge.
- 2 Whether the prosecution has presented compelling reasons to deny bail.
- 3 Whether the proximity of the accused's home to the deceased's family constitutes a sufficient ground to deny bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had not established compelling reasons to deny the accused bail pending trial. The only concern raised was the proximity of the accused's home to that of the deceased, which could potentially lead to conflict. However, the court determined that such concerns could be adequately addressed by imposing stringent bail conditions, including requiring the accused to stay away from his home and not contact prosecution witnesses. The constitutional right to bail could not be curtailed in the absence of evidence of flight risk, interference with witnesses, or other compelling reasons. Therefore, the accused was admitted to bail with specific conditions to...
Court Disposition
bail_granted_with_conditions
Orders
- The accused is admitted to bail and shall be released from remand custody upon executing a bond of Kshs. 350,000 with a surety of like amount.
- As a condition of release, the accused shall stay away from his or his father’s home at Mulwanda, Khwisero, and shall not visit that home during the trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 5 OF 2018
REPUBLIC.............................. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
VERSUS
SAMUEL OMUKUBA OYOMBERA............................................ACCUSED
RULING
1. The accused are charged with murder, contrary to section 203, as read with section 204, of the Penal Code, Cap 63, Laws of Kenya. He pleaded not guilty to the charge. He was first produced in court on 6th February 2018 and plea was taken on 27th February 2018. A bail application was made, whereupon the court called for a pre-bail report.
2. A pre-bail report has been placed on record, dated 13th June 2018. It is not favourable to the accused. It is stated that the families of the accused and the deceased are immediate neighbours. The deceased may have died of a land feud between them. The home and land of the accused’s family is deserted, as he is the sole surviving member of that family, the rest having all died, and upon his arrest, his wife leased out the property and relocated to her parents.
3. It is common ground that pre-trial bail is a constitutional right for all offences. That right can only be curtailed where the prosecution presents compelling reasons. When the issue was raised on 28th October 2019, the state, through Ms. Omondi, objected, saying that the pre-bail report was unfavourable to the accused. The objection was, however, not strenuous as she also indicated that the state was particularly opposed to release on cash bail, and called for stringent terms with respect to bond.
4. Bail would be denied where the accused person is a flight risk, such as where he has no fixed abode, or the circumstances are such that there would be a motive or enticement to flee, or he is likely to interfere with witnesses. None of those issues have been raised by the prosecution. The primary concern is that which is stated in the pre-bail report, that the home of the accused neighbours that of the deceased. That suggests there could be a chance of conflict between their families causing more problems to law and order in the area. Such concerns can, however, be addressed by the stringent conditions that have been called for by the state.
5. I am not persuaded that the prosecution has established compelling reasons for me to deny the accused bail pending trial. I am, however, alive to the issues raised in the pre-bail report.
6. In the end I shall make the following final orders:
(a) That I hereby admit the accused person herein to bail and he shall be realised from remand custody upon executing a bond of Kshs. 350, 000. 00, with a surety of like amount;
(b) That as a condition to that release, the accused person shall stay away from his or his father’s home at Mulwanda, Khwisero, and shall, during the entire duration of the trial, stay away from and not visit that home;
(c) That in addition, he shall not interfere with nor contact any of the prosecution witnesses, and shall attend court at all times when the matter shall be due for mention or hearing or as may be ordered or directed by the court; and
(d) That the bond herein shall be liable to cancellation should the accused person breach or violate any of its terms set out above.
7. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE