[2010] KEHC 447 (KLR)
The court found that the accused, having pleaded guilty to manslaughter, was properly convicted on his own unequivocal plea. In determining sentence, the court considered the gravity of the offence, the brutal and callous manner in which the accused killed his own infant daughter, and the need to protect the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 447 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Samwel Kiprotich Chepkwony
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 26 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Plea of Guilty to Manslaughter
- Outcome
- convicted on plea of guilty; sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing Principles, Plea of Guilty, Mitigation, Child Victims
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Samwel Kiprotich Chepkwony
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Plea of Guilty to Manslaughter
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused was guilty of manslaughter upon his own plea of guilty.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the offence of manslaughter in the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused, having pleaded guilty to manslaughter, was properly convicted on his own unequivocal plea. In determining sentence, the court considered the gravity of the offence, the brutal and callous manner in which the accused killed his own infant daughter, and the need to protect the sanctity of life. While acknowledging the accused's remorse, first offender status, and time spent in remand, the court held that the seriousness of the offence warranted a custodial sentence. The court concluded that a ten-year term of imprisonment was appropriate to reflect both the mitigating and aggravating circumstances, to punish the offender, and to deter similar conduct.
Court Disposition
convicted on plea of guilty; sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to imprisonment for a period of ten years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 26/2009
REPUBLIC…………………………..............................................…………………PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
SAMWEL KIPROTICH CHEPKWONY….......................................................................................…………………ACCUSED
RULING
Prior to his arrest and arraignment in court in May 2009, the accused SAMUEL KIPROTICH CHEPKWONY, had lived with his wife; CATHERINE CHELANGAT,and their three children in Kiptenden village in Kipkelion District of the Rift Valley Province. The third child was BEATRICE CHEPTOO,now deceased, who was aged four and a half months as of October 2008.
The accused had had a quarrel with his wife on 3rd October 2008 and as he suspected that his wife might run away he remarried at home with her throughout on 4th October 2008. She went to her parent’s home which was not far away, when the accused returned home on 5th October 2008, he found his wife and little BEATRICE CHEPTOO missing. He headed to his parents-in-law where he found them. He demanded that they return home. The accused’s mother-in-law was unable to control the accused who grabbed little BEATRICE CHEPTOOand ran away carrying her with him. Alarm was raised and neighbours gave chase. They were unable to catch up with the accused who injured and abandoned BEATRICE CHEPTOO.The neighbours found her with a cut injury in the stomach and took her to Fort Tenant Health Centre from where she was referred to Kericho District Hospital where she died.
The wife of the accused reported the matter to the police and on 16th May 2008, the accused was nabbed.
Investigations into the death of the deceased revealed that BEATRICE CHEPTOO had been cut in the stomach with a sharp object and died of shock from injury and bleeding from the stomach. A Post Mortem was conducted by Dr.Ochieng who made this finding which he recorded in more technical language in the Post Mortem Report dated 6th October 2008 which was produced as evidence and marked as Exhibit No P1.
The accused was initially charged with murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. This charge was reduced to manslaughter under Section 202 as read with Section 205of the Penal Code.
The accused pleaded guilty to the manslaughter charge and was convicted on his own unequivocal plea of guilty.
In mitigation, Mr.Oboso, Learned Counsel for the accused, submitted that the accused was remorseful and had been in custody for over one year. He informed the court that the accused had reflected over his life and regretted having killed his own daughter. Mr.Oboso further told the court in mitigation that the accused is an only child who depended on casual jobs to support his mother, wife and remaining children. He sought a lenient sentence on his behalf and expressed the hope that the accused will reform and put behind him the tragic circumstances in which he killed his own daughter.
I have carefully considered the circumstances in which the accused committed the offence. I have also duly considered the mitigation ably presented by Advocate Oboso on behalf of the accused and have taken into account the fact that the accused is a first offender and that he has been in remand from May 2008 to date. I have also considered the fact that the accused is a young man who slates that he is remorseful and is willing to turn a new leaf and escew crime in future.
Manslaughter is a serious felony. It carries a sentence of life imprisonment. The accused took the life of his own daughter ostensibly so as to hurt his own wife. BEATRICE CHEPTOOwas an innocent little helpless angel caught between an viale husband and wife. She did not have to die. And there was nothing to be gained by the accused in killing her. It was a ruthless, brutal, callous and inhuman act by the accused. Life is precious and no one has the right to take away the life of another. Society expects that Courts of Law will protect the Sanctity of life and punish appropriately those who destroy it. The accused must be punished for this heinous crime. After taking all the circumstances into account, I sentence the accused to imprisonment for a period of ten years.
DATEDat KERICHO this 29th day of July 2010
G B M KARIUKI
RESIDENT JUDGE
COUNSEL APPEARING
P.Kiprop, State Counsel for the Republic.
Mr.Oboso Advocate for the Accused