[2022] KEHC 14392 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 14392 (KLR)

The court held that the application for leave to apply for orders of mandamus was premature because the applicant failed to demonstrate service of the judgment, decree, and certificate of order against the government, as well as a formal demand for settlement of the decretal sum. The statutory duty to settle a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 14392 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Secretary, Public Service Board of Kisumu County; Respondent: County Government of Kisumu; Respondent: Chief Finance Officer County Government of Kisumu; Applicant: Isaac Otieno t/a Basilisk Enterprises
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review E010 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Leave Application
Outcome
application struck out as premature
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Government Liability, Decree Enforcement
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Mandamus Government Liability Decree Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Secretary, Public Service Board of Kisumu County

Respondent

County Government of Kisumu

Respondent

Chief Finance Officer County Government of Kisumu

Respondent

Isaac Otieno t/a Basilisk Enterprises

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Leave Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to apply for orders of mandamus to compel settlement of a court decree against the government.
  2. 2 Whether failure to serve judgment, decree, and certificate of order against the government, and to make a demand for settlement, is fatal to the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the application for leave to apply for orders of mandamus was premature because the applicant failed to demonstrate service of the judgment, decree, and certificate of order against the government, as well as a formal demand for settlement of the decretal sum. The statutory duty to settle a decree against the government only arises after these procedural steps are fulfilled. The absence of evidence of service and demand is fatal to the application, rendering it incompetent at this stage. Consequently, the application was struck out.

Court Disposition

application struck out as premature

Orders

  • The application dated June 7, 2022 is struck out.
  • No orders as to costs.