[2012] KEHC 4740 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 4740 (KLR)

The court found that the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute, as the matter arose from a sale agreement and involved issues of contractual rights and succession, which are outside the scope of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. The applicant had no capacity to sell...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 4740 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson Lugaliki Karani; Respondent: The Senior Resident Magistrate Vihiga; Respondent: Western Land Disputes Appeals Committee; Interested Party: James Misoga Kesohole
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 21 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Certiorari
Outcome
Application allowed. Orders of certiorari granted. Costs awarded to the applicant.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Sale of Land, Capacity to Contract, Succession and Administration, Quashing Orders, Excess of Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal Sale of Land Capacity to Contract Succession and Administration Quashing Orders Excess of Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Lugaliki Karani

Applicant

The Senior Resident Magistrate Vihiga

Respondent

Western Land Disputes Appeals Committee

Respondent

James Misoga Kesohole

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Certiorari

  1. 1 Whether the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee had jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute arising from a sale agreement involving land registered in the name of a deceased person.
  2. 2 Whether the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Vihiga could lawfully entertain or adopt the decision of the Provincial Appeals Committee.
  3. 3 Whether orders of certiorari should issue to quash the proceedings before the Provincial Appeals Committee and the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute, as the matter arose from a sale agreement and involved issues of contractual rights and succession, which are outside the scope of the Land Disputes Tribunal Act. The applicant had no capacity to sell the land as it was registered in his deceased father's name and no grant of letters of administration had been issued. The interested party did not dispute these facts or the revocation of the sale agreement. Consequently, any proceedings or decisions by the Provincial Appeals Committee and any adoption or enforcement by the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court would be ultra...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Orders of certiorari granted. Costs awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 27.7.09 is allowed.
  • Orders of certiorari do issue to quash the proceedings before the Provincial Appeals Committee and the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Vihiga in respect of land parcel No. South Maragoli/Buyonga/2088.