[2002] KEHC 1088 (KLR)
The court held that the law regarding the time for filing criminal appeals must be applied strictly. The State's appeal was filed two days late without leave of court, and no sufficient cause for the delay was shown. The only explanation provided was that instructions were received after the expiry of the appeal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KEHC 1088 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Republic; Respondent: Shadrack Munyasia
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 322 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Time Barred Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as filed out of time.
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Appeals, Time Limits for Appeal, Late Filing, Preliminary Objection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Appellant
Shadrack Munyasia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Time Barred Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State's criminal appeal filed out of time without leave can be admitted.
- 2 Whether sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the law regarding the time for filing criminal appeals must be applied strictly. The State's appeal was filed two days late without leave of court, and no sufficient cause for the delay was shown. The only explanation provided was that instructions were received after the expiry of the appeal period, which does not satisfy the statutory requirements for admitting a late appeal. There was no evidence that the delay was caused by inability to obtain a copy of the judgment or order. Therefore, the preliminary objection was upheld and the appeal was dismissed as being filed out of time.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as filed out of time.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed as being filed out of time and there being no sufficient cause shown for delay.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
6 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.322 OF 2001 (Being an Appeal from Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.4186 of 2000 of the Snr. Resident Magistrate’s Court at Mombasa – L. Achode, SRM) REPUBLIC ………………………………………………. APPELLANT VERSUS SHADRACK MUNYASIA …………………………….. RESPONDENT RULING The State is entitled to appeal even in the case of acquittal in a criminal case. However the procedure must be complied with. The appeal was filed 2 days late and no reason is given except that the complainant gave instructions after the time to appeal had expired (6th September) and the appeal was filed the following day without leave. Section 349 Criminal Procedure Code states in mandatory terms that the appeal shall be entered within 14 days from date of order or sentence appealed against. The proviso states that a late appeal may for good cause be admitted after period has elapsed. And court shall so admit. If it is satisfied that delay was caused by inability to obtain a copy of judgment or order appealed from within a reasonable time of applying to the court for the same. No such circumstances appear here. Instead the State Counsel verbally applied to be allowed to make the necessary application.
This being a criminal case the law must be applied strictly. I do no see any ground upon which the preliminary objection can be rejected.
I therefore dismiss this appeal as being filed out of time and there being no sufficient cause shown for delay.
Dated at Mombasa this 20th Day of March, 2002.
J. KHAMINWA COMMISSIONER OF ASSIZE