[2024] KEHC 5309 (KLR)
The court considered the gravity of the offence, the circumstances of the murder, the accused's lack of remorse, his denial of responsibility, and his failure to cooperate with the probation officer. The court found that the accused was unsuitable for a non-custodial sentence due to these factors and the need for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 5309 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Rodgers Kwemoi Simatwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitale
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 16 (E034) of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Judges
- AC Mrima
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigating Factors, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Rodgers Kwemoi Simatwa
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for the accused convicted of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code?
- 2 Do the circumstances and mitigating factors warrant a non-custodial sentence or custodial sentence?
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the gravity of the offence, the circumstances of the murder, the accused's lack of remorse, his denial of responsibility, and his failure to cooperate with the probation officer. The court found that the accused was unsuitable for a non-custodial sentence due to these factors and the need for rehabilitation and community protection. Applying the Sentencing Policy Guidelines and relevant case law, the court exercised its discretion to impose a custodial sentence of 30 years' imprisonment, commencing from the date of first arraignment. The sentence reflects the seriousness of the offence, the absence of mitigating cooperation, and the objectives of sentencing as...
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- The accused is sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment, to commence from 31st May, 2021.
- File marked as closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Republic v Simatwa (Criminal Case 16 (E034) of 2021) [2024] KEHC 5309 (KLR) (3 May 2024) (Sentence)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 5309 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kitale
Criminal Case 16 (E034) of 2021
AC Mrima, J
May 3, 2024
Between
Republic
State
and
Rodgers Kwemoi Simatwa
Accused
Sentence
1. The accused was charged with the offence of Murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty and he was tried. He was convicted as charged.
2. The Court called for a Pre-Sentence Report for purposes of sentencing.
3. This Court is well abreast of the principles on sentencing and the 2016 Judiciary of Kenya Sentencing Policy Guidelines. As stated by the Supreme Court of Kenya in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another v Republic [2017] eKLR, despite their importance, the guidelines do not replace judicial discretion. This is what the Apex Court stated: -(72)We wish to make it very clear that these guidelines in no way replace judicial discretion. They are advisory and not mandatory. They are geared to promoting consistency and transparency in sentencing hearings. They are also aimed at promoting public understanding of the sentencing process.
4. The purpose of sentencing is expounded in page 15, paragraph 4. 1 of the Sentencing Policy Guidelines as follows: -Sentences are imposed to meet the following objectives:1. Retribution: To punish the offender for his/her criminal conduct in a just manner.2. Deterrence: To deter the offender from committing a similar offence subsequently as well as to discourage other people from committing similar offences.3. Rehabilitation: To enable the offender reform from his criminal disposition and become a law-abiding person.4. Restorative justice: To address the needs arising from the criminal conduct such as loss and damages. Criminal conduct ordinarily occasions victims’, communities’ and offenders’ needs and justice demands that these are met. Further, to promote a sense of responsibility through the offender’s contribution towards meeting the victims’ needs.5. Community protection: To protect the community by incapacitating the offender.6. Denunciation: To communicate the community’s condemnation of the criminal conduct.
5. In sentencing, the Court considers various mitigating factors. Some include: -(a)age of the offender;(b)being a first offender;(c)whether the offender pleaded guilty;(d)character and record of the offender;(e)commission of the offence in response to gender-based violence;(f)remorsefulness of the offender;(g)the possibility of reform and social re-adaptation of the offender;(h)any other factor that the Court considers relevant.
6. In this case, the Accused is aged 53 years old. He was charged with murdering his wife. He did not, however, co-operate with the Probation officer in the course of coming up with the report.
7. The accused’s detailed background has been captured in the Pre-Sentence Report. His attitude to the offence as well as the views of the local community administrators are on record. Mitigations were also tendered.
8. The circumstances under which the offence was committed were captured in the Report as well as in the judgment.
9. The accused still denied responsibility of the offence. He contended that the deceased was drunk and fell on a piece of wood where she sustained the fatal injuries. Further, the Accused has no fixed abode.
10. By considering the totality of the above, this Court finds that the accused is unsuitable for a non-custodial sentence. He requires to undergo counselling and rehabilitation in prison.
11. Consequently, the following sentence is hereby rendered: -a.The accused is hereby sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment. The sentence shall begin as from 31st May, 2021 when the accused was first arraigned before Court.b.File marked as closed.
12. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KITALE THIS 3RD DAY OF MAY, 2024. A. C. MRIMAJUDGESentence delivered in open Court in the presence of:Mr. Kimani, Learned Counsel for the Accused.Miss. Kiptoo, Learned Prosecutor instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions for the State.Chemosop/Duke – Court Assistants.