https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12202

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12202

The court found the offence grave and aggravated by the use of an axe, metal rod, and other blunt weapons targeting the head and neck, but held that the circumstances did not justify the ultimate penalty of death. Balancing the aggravating and mitigating factors, the court imposed a lengthy custodial sentence of 25...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 12202 (KLR)
Parties
Prosecutor: Republic; 1st Accused (convict): Erick Kabaka Sisei; 2nd Accused (deceased): Nelson Kahavere; 3rd Accused (convict): Dan Esolio Sisei; 4th Accused (convict): Kelvin Aseneka; 5th Accused: Bonface Stuma Egovwa; 6th Accused: Alice Minayo; 7th Accused: Catherine Kageha; 8th Accused: Truphena Muhonja
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 38 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder Sentencing / Sentencing After Conviction
Outcome
Partially allowed in mitigation; death penalty rejected; custodial sentences imposed.
Judges
["S Mbungi"]
Legal Topics
Murder, Mitigation, Aggravating Factors, Custodial Sentence, Section 333(2) CPC Credit for Pre Trial Custody, Right of Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Penal Code Murder Mitigation Aggravating Factors Custodial Sentence Section 333(2) CPC Credit for Pre Trial Custody +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Prosecutor

Erick Kabaka Sisei

1st Accused (convict)

Nelson Kahavere

2nd Accused (deceased)

Dan Esolio Sisei

3rd Accused (convict)

Kelvin Aseneka

4th Accused (convict)

Bonface Stuma Egovwa

5th Accused

Alice Minayo

6th Accused

Catherine Kageha

7th Accused

Truphena Muhonja

8th Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Murder Sentencing / Sentencing After Conviction

  1. 1 What sentence was appropriate for the convicted accused persons for murder under sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code.
  2. 2 Whether the death penalty was justified on the facts.
  3. 3 Whether the court should account for time spent in custody under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the offence grave and aggravated by the use of an axe, metal rod, and other blunt weapons targeting the head and neck, but held that the circumstances did not justify the ultimate penalty of death. Balancing the aggravating and mitigating factors, the court imposed a lengthy custodial sentence of 25 years for each convict, with credit for pre-sentence custody under section 333(2) CPC.

Court Disposition

Partially allowed in mitigation; death penalty rejected; custodial sentences imposed.

Orders

  • Each of the 1st, 3rd, and 4th accused persons is sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment for murder contrary to sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code.
  • The period lawfully spent in custody from 15 September 2020 shall be taken into account and deducted by prison authorities under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.