https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8426
The prosecution evidence from six witnesses was sufficient to disclose a prima facie case against the accused in a murder charge, and the accused was therefore placed on his defence under section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 8426 (KLR)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Republic; Accused: Robert Cheruiyot Sitienei
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E019 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case Murder / No Case to Answer Ruling After Prosecution Case
- Outcome
- Accused put on his defence
- Judges
- ["JM Nang'ea"]
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, No Case to Answer, Section 210 Criminal Procedure Code, Accused's Right to Remain Silent
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Prosecution
Robert Cheruiyot Sitienei
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case Murder / No Case to Answer Ruling After Prosecution Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution had established a prima facie case sufficient to require the accused to be put on his defence
- 2 Whether the court should acquit under section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution evidence from six witnesses was sufficient to disclose a prima facie case against the accused in a murder charge, and the accused was therefore placed on his defence under section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
Accused put on his defence
Orders
- The accused shall be put on his defence.
- Ruling accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
**** **REPUBLIC OF KENYA** **IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU** **CRIMINAL CASE NUMBER E019 OF 2025** **REPUBLIC ………………….….………………………………...….. ODPP** **VERSUS** **ROBERT CHERUIYOT SITIENEI…….................………….. ACCUSED** **RULING** 1. The accused is charged with **Murder Contary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.** The particulars of the information presented before the court state that on 2nd April 2025 at Masai Centre-Kiamunyi Area, Rongai Subcounty, in Nakuru County, he murdered Haron Kiprotich . The accused entered plea of “Not Guilty” to the offence. 2. I have perused the evidence adduced by 6 witnesses the prosecution called and note that the defence did not offer submissons “on no case to answer”. At this stage, the prosecution is required to make out a *prima facie* case warranting putting of the accused on his defence or else the accused be acquitted pursuant to the provisions of **section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code.** 3. In the famous case of **Ramanlal T. Bhatt vs Republic,** a *prima facie* case was defined as one in which the court could convict if no defence is offered by the accused. That is not to say, however, that the court will be prepared to convict in every case where the accused fails to give defence. The decision of the court depends on the facts and circumstances of each case while taking into account that the accused has the constitutional right to remain silent. 4. Without delving into further details at this stage, I find that the prosecution has made out a *prima facie* case and the accused is hereby put on his defence. It is established judicial practice that no reasons ought to be given for such decision so that an impression is not created that the court has already made up its mind before hearing the defence case. 5. Ruling accordingly. **J. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE.** **Ruling virtually delivered this 16th day of June, 2026.** **In the presence of:** **The Prosecution Counsel, Ms Anyumba.** **The Defence Counsel, Mr Orege.** **The Accused.** **The Court Assistant, Jeniffer.** **J. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE.**