[2008] KEHC 2132 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had failed to adduce any evidence against the accused persons, as the only witness who could have implicated them was unavailable and no other evidence was presented. Consequently, there was no prima facie case established to require the accused to be put on their defence. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 2132 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Solomon Kabuti Ejwa; Defendant: Criopus Mutundu Moses
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 47 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- DK Maraga
- Legal Topics
- Murder Charge, Acquittal, Standard of Proof, Criminal Procedure, Evidence Requirements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Solomon Kabuti Ejwa
Defendant
Criopus Mutundu Moses
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused persons murdered the deceased.
- 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence to put the accused on their defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had failed to adduce any evidence against the accused persons, as the only witness who could have implicated them was unavailable and no other evidence was presented. Consequently, there was no prima facie case established to require the accused to be put on their defence. The court therefore acquitted the accused under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code, holding that the prosecution had not met the threshold required to proceed with the case.
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- The accused persons are acquitted under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- The accused persons are to be set free forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
13 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Criminal Case 47 of 2004
REPUBLIC……………………………..……….PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
SOLOMON KABUTI EJWA…….………...…….1ST ACCUSED
CRIOPUS MUTUNDU MOSES……………..…2ND ACCUSED
JUDGMENT
SOLOMON KABUTI EJWAand CRIOPUS MUTUNDU MOSES are charged with murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge against them are that during the night of 2nd and 3rd February 2004 at Mukarafu Estate, Nakuru District of Rift Valley Province they murdered John Kuliyo Parsalach. They denied the charge and after calling the evidence of five witnesses the prosecution closed its case.
The prosecution case is that on 2nd February 2004 at about 5. 30 p.m. PW1 and PW2 who are mechanics at Mkarafu Garage left their watchman, the deceased, at their garage alive and well. The following morning when they reported on duty they found his dead body in the garage with several cut wounds on the head. Dr. Aduro who performed the post mortem on that body later opined that the cause of death was cardio respiratory failure due to intracranial haemorrhage resulting from the head injury caused by a blunt object.
On being called, police went to the scene immediately and while there with a crowd that had gathered, a young girl by the name Susan Warikia pointed at the Accused persons, who were in the crowd, as the people she saw beating up the deceased the previous night. They were immediately arrested and later charged with this offence. The Investigating Officer, PC Micah Yator, PW5, said that the prosecution was to rely entirely on the evidence of that girl. However, due to the post election skirmishes they are not able to trace her at all. That explains why the prosecution closed its case without calling her.
It is clear from what is stated hereinabove that the prosecution has adduced no evidence at all against the Accused persons. In the circumstances I find that the Accused have no case to answer and I accordingly acquit them under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code. I order that they be set free forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
DATED and delivered at Nakuru this 24th day of July, 2008.
D. K. MARAGA
JUDGE