[2013] KEHC 2024 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, though lacking eyewitness testimony, had adduced sufficient circumstantial evidence to establish a prima facie case of murder against the accused. Consequently, the accused was placed on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 2024 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Sospeter Njeru Nthiga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Murder Case 2 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Murder Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Accused placed on his defence.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Circumstantial Evidence, Prima Facie Case
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Sospeter Njeru Nthiga
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Murder Case / Ruling on Prima Facie Case at Close of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant his being placed on his defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, though lacking eyewitness testimony, had adduced sufficient circumstantial evidence to establish a prima facie case of murder against the accused. Consequently, the accused was placed on his defence in accordance with Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court was satisfied that the evidence presented, if unchallenged, could potentially sustain a conviction, thus necessitating the accused to respond to the case against him.
Court Disposition
Accused placed on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is placed on his defence under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
MURDER CASE NO. 2 OF 2009
REPUBLIC....................................................PROSECUTION
VERSUS
SOSPETER NJERU NTHIGA..........….......................ACCUSED
R U L I N G
The accused is charged with the offence of Murder contrary to section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. Several witnesses have testified. There was no eye witness. I am satisfied that through the circumstantial evidence adduced, the Prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused.
I place him on his defence under the provisions of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013.
H.I. ONG’UDI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Ms. Ingahizu for State
Accused
Njue CC