[2020] KEHC 2289 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 2289 (KLR)

The Court determined that, in light of the statutory and constitutional provisions governing the removal and appointment of members to the County Assembly Service Board, as well as the jurisdictional questions raised by the involvement of political party disputes and employment relations, it would be inappropriate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 2289 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: The Speaker of the Nairobi County Assembly; Respondent: The Clerk of the Nairobi County Assembly; Respondent: The Nairobi County Assembly; Respondent: The Nairobi County Assembly Service Board; Respondent: Hon. Catherine Akoth; Applicant: Hon. Mamaurice Otieno Gari
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E033 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders
Outcome
Directions issued for inter partes hearing of the application for leave; no substantive orders granted at this stage.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, County Assembly Service Board, Removal and Appointment of Board Members, Leave to Apply, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review County Assembly Service Board Removal and Appointment of Board Members Leave to Apply Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

The Speaker of the Nairobi County Assembly

Respondent

The Clerk of the Nairobi County Assembly

Respondent

The Nairobi County Assembly

Respondent

The Nairobi County Assembly Service Board

Respondent

Hon. Catherine Akoth

Respondent

Hon. Mamaurice Otieno Gari

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders

  1. 1 Whether the ex parte Applicant is entitled to leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition against the Respondents' actions.
  2. 2 Whether the removal and replacement of the ex parte Applicant as a member of the Nairobi County Assembly Service Board was lawful under section 12 of the County Government Act.
  3. 3 Whether the dispute falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court or is properly before the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court determined that, in light of the statutory and constitutional provisions governing the removal and appointment of members to the County Assembly Service Board, as well as the jurisdictional questions raised by the involvement of political party disputes and employment relations, it would be inappropriate to grant leave to apply for judicial review ex parte. The Court held that the application for leave raises issues that require inter partes hearing, particularly regarding the proper forum for the dispute and the legality of the Respondents' actions. Accordingly, the Court directed that the application be served on the Respondents and set timelines for the filing of responses...

Court Disposition

Directions issued for inter partes hearing of the application for leave; no substantive orders granted at this stage.

Orders

  • The ex parte Applicant to serve the Respondents with the Chamber Summons, skeletal submissions, these directions, and a hearing notice within 21 days.
  • Respondents granted leave to file and serve responses and submissions within 21 days of service.