[2020] KEHC 2289 (KLR)
The Court determined that, in light of the statutory and constitutional provisions governing the removal and appointment of members to the County Assembly Service Board, as well as the jurisdictional questions raised by the involvement of political party disputes and employment relations, it would be inappropriate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 2289 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: The Speaker of the Nairobi County Assembly; Respondent: The Clerk of the Nairobi County Assembly; Respondent: The Nairobi County Assembly; Respondent: The Nairobi County Assembly Service Board; Respondent: Hon. Catherine Akoth; Applicant: Hon. Mamaurice Otieno Gari
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E033 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders
- Outcome
- Directions issued for inter partes hearing of the application for leave; no substantive orders granted at this stage.
- Judges
- P Nyamweya
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, County Assembly Service Board, Removal and Appointment of Board Members, Leave to Apply, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
The Speaker of the Nairobi County Assembly
Respondent
The Clerk of the Nairobi County Assembly
Respondent
The Nairobi County Assembly
Respondent
The Nairobi County Assembly Service Board
Respondent
Hon. Catherine Akoth
Respondent
Hon. Mamaurice Otieno Gari
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ex parte Applicant is entitled to leave to apply for judicial review orders of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition against the Respondents' actions.
- 2 Whether the removal and replacement of the ex parte Applicant as a member of the Nairobi County Assembly Service Board was lawful under section 12 of the County Government Act.
- 3 Whether the dispute falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court or is properly before the High Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined that, in light of the statutory and constitutional provisions governing the removal and appointment of members to the County Assembly Service Board, as well as the jurisdictional questions raised by the involvement of political party disputes and employment relations, it would be inappropriate to grant leave to apply for judicial review ex parte. The Court held that the application for leave raises issues that require inter partes hearing, particularly regarding the proper forum for the dispute and the legality of the Respondents' actions. Accordingly, the Court directed that the application be served on the Respondents and set timelines for the filing of responses...
Court Disposition
Directions issued for inter partes hearing of the application for leave; no substantive orders granted at this stage.
Orders
- The ex parte Applicant to serve the Respondents with the Chamber Summons, skeletal submissions, these directions, and a hearing notice within 21 days.
- Respondents granted leave to file and serve responses and submissions within 21 days of service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
56 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. MISC. E033 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, AND PROHIBITION
BETWEEN
REPUBLIC........................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE SPEAKER OF THE NAIROBI
COUNTY ASSEMBLY..............................................................1st RESPONDENT
THE CLERK OF THE NAIROBI
COUNTY ASSEMBLY............................................................2nd RESPONDENT
THE NAIROBI COUNTY ASSEMBLY..................................3rd RESPONDENT
THE NAIROBI COUNTY
ASSEMBLY SERVICE BOARD.............................................4th RESPONDENT
HON. CATHERINE AKOTH..................................................5th RESPONDENT
EX PARTE APPLICANT:
HON. MAMAURICE OTIENO GARI
RULING
1. The ex parte Applicant herein has filed an application by way of a Chamber Summons dated 4th September 2020, seeking leave to apply for orders of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition with respect to the 1st Respondent’s decision and action of publishing Gazette Notice number 6390 dated 26th August, 2020 on the 28th August 2020, notifying of the appointment of the 5th Respondent as a member of the Nairobi City County Assembly Service Board, and the removal of the ex parte Applicant as a member of the said Board.
2. The said application is supported by a statutory statement dated 4th September 2020, and a verifying affidavit sworn on the same date by the ex parte Applicant. Upon perusal of the application and supporting documents, I note that the Applicant is relying on the provisions of section 12 of the County Government Act on the establishment of the county assembly service boards which provides as follows:
“(1) There shall be a county assembly service board for each county assembly.
(2) The county assembly service board shall be a body corporate with perpetual succession and a common seal.
(3) The Board consists of—
(a) the Speaker of the county assembly, as the chairperson;
(b) a vice-chairperson elected by the Board from the members appointed under paragraph (c);
(c) two members of the county assembly nominated by the political parties represented in the county assembly according to their proportion of members in the county assembly; and
(d) one man and one woman appointed by the county assembly from amongst persons who are experienced in public affairs, but are not members of the county assembly.
(3A) The members of the Board appointed under section 12(3)(d) shall serve on a part-time basis.
(4) The county assembly clerk shall be the secretary to the county assembly service board.
(5) A member of the county assembly service board shall vacate office—
(a) if the person is a member of the county assembly—
(i) at the end of the term of the county assembly; or
(ii) if the person ceases to be a member of the county assembly; or
(b) if the person is an appointed member, on revocation of the person’s appointment by the county assembly; or
(c) if the person is the Speaker, when the person ceases to be such Speaker.”
3. Some of the grounds for the application stated in the statutory statement are as follows:
“(a) It is not in dispute that the 1st Respondent, on the 26th August, 2020, swore in andgazetted the 5th Respondent as an appointed member to the Nairobi County Assembly Service Board as representative for the Orange Democratic Party.
(b) It is undisputed, too, that at the time of this impugned decision the ex parte Applicant served, as representative of the Orange Democratic Party, in the County AssemblyBoard pursuant to his appointment on the 18th October, 2019, and gazette notice number 9978 issued on the 22nd October, 2019.
(c) The 1st Respondent purported to rely on a letter from the Orange Democratic Party dated the 18th August, 2020, alleging to make changes to minority leadership within the County Assembly; contrary to the provisions of Section 12 (5) of the County Government Act.”
4. In light of the provisions of the Political Parties Act as regards the resolution of disputes between members of political parties, and the provisions of Articles 162(2) (a) and 165(5) of the Constitution, and section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Act on the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court, it is my view that the question of leave to commence judicial review proceedings against the Respondents require to be heard inter partes before any orders can be granted by this Court.
5. In the circumstances, I hereby direct and order as follows:
I.The ex parte Applicant shall serve the Respondents with theChamber Summons dated 4th September 2020, (ii) skeletal submissions on the said Chamber Summons (iii) a copy of these directions and (iv) a hearing notice with twenty-one (21) days of today’s date.
II.The Respondents are granted leave to file and serve their responses to theChamber Summons dated 4th September 2020 and skeletal submissions thereon within twenty-one (21) days of service by the Applicant.
III. The Chamber Summons dated 4th September 2020 shall be heard on 12th October 2020.
IV. In view of the Ministry of Health directives on the safeguards to be observed to stem the spread of the current COVID-19 pandemic, this Court shall hear and determine the Applicant’s Chamber Summons dated 4th September 2020 on the basis of the electronic copies of the pleadings and the written submissions filed by the parties.
V.All the parties shall file their pleadings and submissions electronically, by filing them with the Judiciary e-filing system, and send copies by electronic mail to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comandasunachristine51@gmail.com.
VI. The electronic copies of pleadings and documents sent by the parties shall be clearly and correctly titled to indicate the J.R Case Number, the description of the Party sending it (that is whether the Ex Parte Applicant, Respondent or Interested Party), and the nature of the pleading or document.
VII.The service of pleadings and documents directed by the Court shall be by way of personal service andelectronic mail, and in the case of service by way of electronic mail, the parties shall also email a copy of the documents so served to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies to asunachristine51@gmail.com.
VIII.The parties shall also be required to file and send to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division their respective affidavits of service evidencing personal service, by way of electronic mail tojudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies to asunachristine51@gmail.com.
IX.The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall put this matter on the Division’s causelist for hearing on12th October2020
X.The Deputy Registrar ofthe Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of these directions to the ex parte Applicant by electronic mail by close of business on Monday, 7th September 2020.
XI. Parties shall be at liberty to apply.
6. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020
P. NYAMWEYA
JUDGE