[2025] KEHC 3623 (KLR)
The High Court declined to suspend or set aside the Sports Disputes Tribunal's order ex parte, holding that there was no evidence the Tribunal acted outside its jurisdiction or that there were motions other than the one concerning the Chairman. The court reasoned that setting aside the Tribunal's order without...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 3623 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Sports Disputes Tribunal; Applicant: Board of Directors, Kenya Rugby Union; Interested Party: Alexander Kiplagat Mutai; Interested Party: Kenya Rugby Union
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E033 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ex Parte Interim Application for Stay Orders Pending Inter Partes Hearing
- Outcome
- Interim stay or setting aside of the Tribunal's order declined; applicant directed to serve for inter partes hearing.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Interim Injunctions, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Sports Governance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Sports Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
Board of Directors, Kenya Rugby Union
Applicant
Alexander Kiplagat Mutai
Interested Party
Kenya Rugby Union
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Ex Parte Interim Application for Stay Orders Pending Inter Partes Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sports Disputes Tribunal acted outside its jurisdiction by barring all motions for removal of Board members at the AGM pending mediation.
- 2 Whether the High Court should grant interim stay or set aside the Tribunal's order ex parte before hearing all parties.
- 3 Whether there was evidence of any motion other than the motion of no confidence against the Chairman.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court declined to suspend or set aside the Sports Disputes Tribunal's order ex parte, holding that there was no evidence the Tribunal acted outside its jurisdiction or that there were motions other than the one concerning the Chairman. The court reasoned that setting aside the Tribunal's order without hearing all parties would amount to substituting the Tribunal's decision with its own prematurely. The applicant was directed to serve the respondent for an inter partes hearing, as both parties were represented when the impugned order was made and there was no application for review before the Tribunal. The court emphasized the importance of due process and the need to avoid ex...
Court Disposition
Interim stay or setting aside of the Tribunal's order declined; applicant directed to serve for inter partes hearing.
Orders
- Application for interim stay or setting aside of the Tribunal's order is declined at the ex parte stage.
- Applicant to serve the respondent with the application for inter partes consideration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
Republic v Sports Disputes Tribunal; Board of Directors, Kenya Rugby Union (Exparte Applicant); Mutai & another (Interested Parties) (Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E033 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 3623 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (24 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 3623 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Judicial Review
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E033 of 2025
RE Aburili, J
March 24, 2025
Between
Republic
Applicant
and
Sports Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
and
Board of Directors, Kenya Rugby Union
Exparte Applicant
and
Alexander Kiplagat Mutai
Interested Party
Kenya Rugby Union
Interested Party
Ruling
1. The applicants are appearing exparte in the first instance. They seek for interim orders under certificate of urgency and filed vide application dated 20th March 2025, for stay of any proceedings in the Sports Disputes Tribunal.
2. Mr. Hansen counsel for the applicants argues in support of the certificate of urgency and the prayer for stay, that the union is scheduled to meet this afternoon and that the orders sought to be set aside or quashed, were made respectively order 4, when it was not among the prayers sought in the application dated 12/3/2025 before the Sports Disputes Tribunal.
3. The order bars all motion for the removal of any Board member in the AGM slated for 24/3/2025 and directs that such motion shall not form part of the Agenda for that meeting, pending mediation process.
4. The mediation process, on the other hand, the timelines given go beyond the date for the AGM.
5. I have considered the application exparte in the first instance, and the arguments by Mr. Hansen. I have also perused the Notice of Motion dated 12/3/2025 as filed before the Sports Disputes Tribunal.
6. Prayer No. 3 seeks a temporary injunction restraining the Respondent from presenting a motion of no confidence against the appellant to members of the Kenya Rugby Union and or its affiliates at the 2025 Kenya Rugby Union Annual General Meeting.
7. The Acting Chairperson of the Sports Disputes Tribunal Hon. Njeri Onyango ordered that all motions for the Removal of any of the Board members in the Annual General Meeting slated for 24th March 2025 shall not form part of the Agenda for that meeting pending the mediation process. It is not claimed that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to refer the dispute for mediation.
8. In addition, the applicant has not annexed any evidence to show that apart from the Notice of Motion of no confidence against Mr. Alexander Kiplagat Mutai seeking to remove him from office as Chairman of Kenya Rugby Union, there was any other motion.
9. It follows that the acting Chairperson in using the term – “all motions” cannot be interpreted to mean that she was acting outside the prayers sought. This is because the only motion shown to this court is that for the removal of the Chairman filed or issued by the Homeboyz Rfc Mr. Oscar Mango and it refers to the person of Mr. Alexander Kiplagat Mutai.
10. To set aside the order by the Acting Chairman Sports Disputes Tribunal without first understanding all the circumstances giving rise to that order, and in view of absence of evidence of any other motion given to the Secretary of the Union will be substituting the decision of the Tribunal with this court’s own decision before hearing all the parties involved, noting that both parties were represented on the date that the order in question was made and there is nothing to show that an application was made before the Acting Chairperson, to review that order.
11. I therefore decline to suspend or set aside that order before hearing all the parties involved. Furthermore, a Notice of Motion of no confidence in the leadership of the Union can be raised at any time and can be considered as a Special Matter for a special AGM called by members.
12. The applicant is directed to serve the Respondents with the application for consideration inter partes. Directions shall be given on 7/04/2025.
13. I so order.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI VIRTUALLY THIS 24THDAY OF MARCH, 2025R.E. ABURILIJUDGE2| JR NO. 033 OF 2025 RULING