[2020] KEHC 6414 (KLR)
The Court found that the Applicant's grievance concerns the process and qualifications for appointment to a public office, which typically falls within the jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court. However, given the urgency arising from the appointment already having been made, the Court certified...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 6414 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mustafah Otieno Ochieng; Respondent: State Corporations Advisory Committee; Respondent: National Water Harvesting & Storage Authority; Respondent: Board of Directors National Water Harvesting & Storage Authority; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: Erick Okeyo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Judicial Review Application 91 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave and Interim Orders
- Outcome
- Application certified urgent; directions issued for inter partes hearing; no substantive interim relief granted at this stage.
- Judges
- P Nyamweya
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Appointment to Public Office, Mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition, Jurisdiction of Courts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mustafah Otieno Ochieng
Applicant
State Corporations Advisory Committee
Respondent
National Water Harvesting & Storage Authority
Respondent
Board of Directors National Water Harvesting & Storage Authority
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Erick Okeyo
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave and Interim Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the process and qualifications for the appointment of the Interested Party as Chairman of the Board of National Water Harvesting & Storage Authority were lawful.
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction or the matter falls within the Employment and Labour Relations Court.
- 3 Whether leave for judicial review orders of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus should be granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Applicant's grievance concerns the process and qualifications for appointment to a public office, which typically falls within the jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court. However, given the urgency arising from the appointment already having been made, the Court certified the application as urgent and directed that all parties be served and heard before any substantive orders on leave or stay are granted. The Court made procedural orders to ensure expeditious and fair hearing, including electronic filing and service in light of COVID-19 restrictions, but declined to grant ex parte substantive interim relief at this stage.
Court Disposition
Application certified urgent; directions issued for inter partes hearing; no substantive interim relief granted at this stage.
Orders
- The Amended Chamber Summons application dated 8th May 2020 is certified as urgent and admitted for hearing on a priority basis.
- Applicant to serve Respondents and Interested Party with application, ruling, and mention notice within ten days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
45 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 91 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF MANDAMUS
BETWEEN
MUSTAFAH OTIENO OCHIENG.................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE STATE CORPORATIONS ADVISORY
COMMITTEE........................................................................1ST RESPONDENT
NATIONAL WATER HARVESTING & STORAGE
AUTHORITY........................................................................2ND RESPONDENT
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS NATIONAL
WATER HARVESTING & STORAGE AUTHORITY...3RD RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL...........................................4TH RESPONDENT
AND
ERICK OKEYO............................................................INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
The Application
1. The Applicant herein has moved this Court in an application brought by way of an Amended Chamber Summons dated 8th May 2020. He is seeking the following orders:
(a) The application be certified urgent.
(b) Leave be granted to the Applicant to apply for judicial review by way of an order of certiorari removing into the High Court and quashing the decision contained in the Gazette Notice No.2355 dated 10th March 2020, and published on 20th March 2020 Appointing Erick Okeyo for the position of Chairman of the Board National Water and Harvesting and Storage Authority, for a period of three (3) years with effect from 20th March 2020.
(c) Leave be granted to the Applicant to apply for judicial review by way of an order of prohibition to issue against the 2nd and 3rd Respondent from treating or in any other way holding out or according the Interested Party any treatment as a chairman of its board of directors on the strength of Gazette Notice NO. 2355 dated 10th March 2020, and Published on 20th M arch 2020.
(d) The order granting leave do operate as a stay of the implementation of Gazette Notice No.2355 dated 10th March 2020, and published on 20th March 2020 Appointing Erick Okeyo for the position of Chairman of the Board National Water Harvesting and Storage Authority, for a period of three (3) years with effect from 20th March 2020.
(e) An order of status quo to issue against the Respondents on the state of affairs prior to Gazette Notice No.2355 dated 10th March 2020, and published on 20th March 2020 Appointing Erick Okeyo for the position of Chairman of the Board National Water Harvesting and Storage Authority pending the hearing and determination of the substantive Application.
(f) The costs of the application to abide the final outcome of the substantive motion.
2. The application is supported by a statutory statement dated 6th May 2020, and a verifying affidavit sworn on the same date by the Applicant.
3. After a perusal of the Applicant’s pleadings, I note that his main grievance and grounds for the application are the process and qualifications and terms of appointment of the Interested Party to public office, including his qualifications. These type of dispute is ordinarily within the jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court. In addition, the said appointment was made about two months ago on 10th March 2020, and the current obtaining status needs to be confirmed before any orders are granted.
4. Therefore, while this matter is demonstrated to be urgent as a result of the said appointment already having been made, It is for the same reason necessary to first hear all parties concerned on the orders sought by the Applicant, both as to the question of leave and stay.
The Orders:
5. In the premises I direct and orders as follows:
i. The ex parte Applicant’s Amended Chamber Summons application dated 8th May 2020 be and is hereby certified as urgent, and is hereby admitted for hearing on a priority basis.
ii. Theex parteApplicant shall serve the Respondents and the Interested Party with (i) the Amended Chamber Summons application dated 8th May 2020 and submissions thereon, (ii) a copy of this ruling and orders therein, and (iii) a mention notice within ten (10) days from today’s date for inter partes hearing.
iii. Upon being served with the said pleadings and documents, the Respondents and the Interested Party shall be required to file their responses to, and submissions on the said Amended Chamber Summons application within ten (10) days from the date of service.
iv. This matter shall be mentioned on 2nd June 2020 for further directions.
v. In view of the Ministry of Health directives on the safeguards to be observed to stem the spread of the current COVID-19 pandemic, this Court shall hear and determine the Applicant’s Amended Chamber Summons application dated 8th May 2020 on the basis of the electronic copies of the pleadings and the written submissions filed by the parties.In this respect, all the parties shall file their pleadings, applications and written submissions electronically, by sending them to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies to asunachristine51@gmail.com,and shall also avail the electronic copies in word format.
vi. The electronic copies of pleadings and documents sent by the parties shall be clearly and correctly titled to indicate the J.R Case Number, the name of the Party sending it (that is whether the Ex Parte Applicant, Respondent or Interested Party), and the nature of the pleading or document.
vii. The service of pleadings and documents directed by the Court shall be by way of personal service andelectronic mail, and in the case of service by way of electronic mail, the parties shall also email a copy of the documents so served to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies toasunachristine51@gmail.com.
viii. The parties shall also be required to send the respective affidavits of service by way of electronic mail to the Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division atjudicialreview48@gmail.comwith copies toasunachristine51@gmail.com.
ix. The Deputy Registrar ofthe Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling and the extracted orders to the Applicant by electronic mail by close of business on Friday,8th May 2020.
x. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall put this matter on the Division’s causelist for mention on 2nd June 2020, and bring it to the attention of a Judge in the Division on that date for directions.
xi. Parties shall be at liberty to apply.
6. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 8TH DAY OF MAY 2020
P. NYAMWEYA
JUDGE