[2017] KEHC 4288 (KLR)
The court found that the accused, a police officer, was armed with a Ceska pistol and present at the scene where the deceased was shot. Ballistic evidence confirmed that the cartridge recovered at the scene was fired from the accused's firearm. Eyewitnesses placed the accused at the scene, and the accused's own statement under inquiry admitted his gun discharged and hit someone. The court found no evidence of malice aforethought or intention to kill, as the deceased had already bribed the officers and there was no motive to shoot him. The words uttered by the accused immediately after the shooting indicated an accidental discharge rather than a deliberate act. The court held that the...
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 4288 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Stephen Bunnet Simion
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2017
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 17 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Conviction for manslaughter under section 202 of the Penal Code; acquittal on murder charge.
- Judges
- AM Cockar
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Unlawful Killing, Use of Firearms by Police, Malice Aforethought, Confession Evidence, Criminal Liability
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Stephen Bunnet Simion
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused shot and killed the deceased with his firearm.
- 2 Whether the accused had malice aforethought or intention to kill.
- 3 Whether the accused's statement under inquiry was a confession and its probative value.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accused, a police officer, was armed with a Ceska pistol and present at the scene where the deceased was shot. Ballistic evidence confirmed that the cartridge recovered at the scene was fired from the accused's firearm. Eyewitnesses placed the accused at the scene, and the accused's own statement under inquiry admitted his gun discharged and hit someone. The court found no evidence of malice aforethought or intention to kill, as the deceased had already bribed the officers and there was no motive to shoot him. The words uttered by the accused immediately after the shooting indicated an accidental discharge rather than a deliberate act. The court held that the...
Court Disposition
Conviction for manslaughter under section 202 of the Penal Code; acquittal on murder charge.
Orders
- The charge of murder is substituted with manslaughter contrary to section 202 of the Penal Code.
- The accused is convicted of manslaughter under section 322 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment