[2017] KEHC 4288 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 4288 (KLR)

The court found that the accused, a police officer, was armed with a Ceska pistol and present at the scene where the deceased was shot. Ballistic evidence confirmed that the cartridge recovered at the scene was fired from the accused's firearm. Eyewitnesses placed the accused at the scene, and the accused's own statement under inquiry admitted his gun discharged and hit someone. The court found no evidence of malice aforethought or intention to kill, as the deceased had already bribed the officers and there was no motive to shoot him. The words uttered by the accused immediately after the shooting indicated an accidental discharge rather than a deliberate act. The court held that the...

Citation
[2017] KEHC 4288 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Stephen Bunnet Simion
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
27 April 2017
Case Number
Criminal Case 17 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Judgment
Outcome
Conviction for manslaughter under section 202 of the Penal Code; acquittal on murder charge.
Judges
AM Cockar
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Unlawful Killing, Use of Firearms by Police, Malice Aforethought, Confession Evidence, Criminal Liability
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Stephen Bunnet Simion

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the accused shot and killed the deceased with his firearm.
  2. 2 Whether the accused had malice aforethought or intention to kill.
  3. 3 Whether the accused's statement under inquiry was a confession and its probative value.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the accused, a police officer, was armed with a Ceska pistol and present at the scene where the deceased was shot. Ballistic evidence confirmed that the cartridge recovered at the scene was fired from the accused's firearm. Eyewitnesses placed the accused at the scene, and the accused's own statement under inquiry admitted his gun discharged and hit someone. The court found no evidence of malice aforethought or intention to kill, as the deceased had already bribed the officers and there was no motive to shoot him. The words uttered by the accused immediately after the shooting indicated an accidental discharge rather than a deliberate act. The court held that the...

Court Disposition

Conviction for manslaughter under section 202 of the Penal Code; acquittal on murder charge.

Orders

  • The charge of murder is substituted with manslaughter contrary to section 202 of the Penal Code.
  • The accused is convicted of manslaughter under section 322 of the Criminal Procedure Code.