[2015] KEHC 991 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, including eyewitness testimony and medical evidence from the pathologist, established that the deceased was assaulted while in police custody and died as a result of injuries consistent with blunt trauma. The evidence was sufficient to establish a prima facie case...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 991 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Stephen Kariko; Defendant: Hillary Ndhiwa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 83 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- case to answer found; accused to be put on their defence
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure Code Section 306, Police Misconduct, Causation of Death
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Stephen Kariko
Defendant
Hillary Ndhiwa
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused persons for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether the evidence on record is sufficient to require the accused to be put on their defence under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution's evidence, including eyewitness testimony and medical evidence from the pathologist, established that the deceased was assaulted while in police custody and died as a result of injuries consistent with blunt trauma. The evidence was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against both accused persons for the offence of murder. Accordingly, the court ruled that each accused has a case to answer under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code and must be put on their defence.
Court Disposition
case to answer found; accused to be put on their defence
Orders
- Each accused is found to have a case to answer under Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- The accused are to be put on their defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL CASE NO.83 OF 2013
REPUBLIC....................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
STEPHEN KARIKO ………………....……………….1ST ACCUSED
HILLARY NDHIWA.…...............................................2ND ACCUSED
RULING
1. Hillary Ndhiwa and Stephen Kariko are the 1st and 2nd accused respectively in Criminal Case No. 83/2013. They are charged with the murder of Joseph Wanjohi Nderitu. The offence was allegedly committed on 17th March 2013 at Makongeni Estate in Ruai, Njiru District within Nairobi County. Both accused were arraigned in court on 1st August 2013 when they pleaded not guilty to the charge and were remanded in custody. They were subsequently released on bail after key witnesses had testified.
2. The prosecution case is that the accused were officers serving at the Administration Police (AP) Post at Makongeni. That on or around 17th day of March 2013, the deceased was arrested and placed in custody in the said AP camp on allegation of having broken into a shop and stolen goods. The complainant one Jemimah Wambui who testified as PW1 told the court that she had left the key to her shop with the accused. Both PW1 and her husband PW2 told the court that they reported the theft and that the deceased was arrested and placed in custody. PW3, PW4, PW5, PW6, PW7 and PW8 who were friends and relatives of the deceased went to the AP camp when they learnt of his arrest. They found him having been severely assaulted and in a bad state. Upon their insistence, the accused persons took the deceased to Mama Lucy Kibaki Hospital. He later died while undergoing treatment. The accused persons were said to have abandoned the deceased in hospital.
3. PW9 and PW10 told the court that they were in custody at the AP camp when the deceased was brought into the cell. The pathologist Dr. Johansen Oduor who testified at PW12 told the court that he found multiple bruises on the deceased’s body particularly on the knees, the left lower jaw and the left side of the trunk. He also found massive bleeding below the skin and bleeding into the brain. He formed the opinion that the cause of death was shock due to bleeding as a result of blunt trauma.
4. I have carefully considered the evidence now on record as outlined above. It is my finding that the prosecution has established a prima faciecase against both accused persons. Each accused has a case to answer in accordance with Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ruling delivered and signedat Nairobi this 25th day of November, 2015.
R.LAGAT-KORIR
JUDGE
In the presence of:
…....................................................: Court clerk
……………………………………: 1st accused
……………………………………: 2nd accused
........................................................: Counsel for 1st accused
……………………………………: Counsel for 2nd accused
........................................................: Counsel for the State/accused