[1998] KECA 36 (KLR)

[1998] KECA 36 (KLR)

The Deputy Registrar determined that the instructions fee claimed by the appellants was excessive given the nature of the appeal, which did not present exceptional complexity beyond the narrowing of issues typical at the appellate stage. The court considered the costs awarded in the High Court, the conduct of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] KECA 36 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Republic; Respondent: The Commissioner for Co-operative Societies; Interested Party: Sukuma Wiki Co-operative Society Ltd; Interested Party: Onesmus Thiongo Kinyati; Interested Party: Charles Maina Mwangi; Interested Party: David Kiragu Wanjagi; Interested Party: Maina Gikuhi; Interested Party: John Kiarie Simon; Interested Party: Andrew Watiki Gikonjo; Interested Party: Muchoki Mbuti; Interested Party: Crispus Maina Waithaka; Ex Parte: Daniel Macharia; Ex Parte: Elishiba Wangari (Mrs); Ex Parte: Joseph Mwaniki; Ex Parte: Kamau Kagombe; Ex Parte: Fredrick Kibochi; Ex Parte: Njeri Njoroge
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 77 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Taxation of Bill of Costs After Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Bill of costs taxed and allowed in part.
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Instructions Fee, Cooperative Societies, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Taxation of Costs Instructions Fee Cooperative Societies Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Appellant

The Commissioner for Co-operative Societies

Respondent

Sukuma Wiki Co-operative Society Ltd

Interested Party

Onesmus Thiongo Kinyati

Interested Party

Charles Maina Mwangi

Interested Party

David Kiragu Wanjagi

Interested Party

Maina Gikuhi

Interested Party

John Kiarie Simon

Interested Party

Andrew Watiki Gikonjo

Interested Party

Muchoki Mbuti

Interested Party

Crispus Maina Waithaka

Interested Party

Daniel Macharia

Ex Parte

Elishiba Wangari (Mrs)

Ex Parte

Joseph Mwaniki

Ex Parte

Kamau Kagombe

Ex Parte

Fredrick Kibochi

Ex Parte

Njeri Njoroge

Ex Parte

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Taxation of Bill of Costs After Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the instructions fee claimed in the bill of costs for the appeal is reasonable and justified.
  2. 2 Whether certain disbursements and profit costs claimed are allowable under the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The Deputy Registrar determined that the instructions fee claimed by the appellants was excessive given the nature of the appeal, which did not present exceptional complexity beyond the narrowing of issues typical at the appellate stage. The court considered the costs awarded in the High Court, the conduct of the matter, and the submissions of counsel. The Registrar found KShs.70,000/= to be a reasonable instructions fee in the circumstances. Additionally, the Registrar disallowed certain disbursements, including refundable security, and profit costs where more than a quarter of the claim was disallowed. The bill of costs was taxed accordingly, reflecting a fair and proportionate award of...

Court Disposition

Bill of costs taxed and allowed in part.

Orders

  • Instructions fee allowed at KShs.70,000/=
  • KShs.1,000/= taxed off item 7 by consent.