[2023] KEHC 17902 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused, Dedan Ouma Sweta, for the alleged murder of Victor Owuor Okita. The evidence on record, including that of the witness who was stood down, was deemed sufficient at this stage to require the accused to be placed on his...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 17902 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Dedan Ouma Sweta
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 20 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Prosecution Evidence
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Murder Trial, Evidentiary Weight
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Dedan Ouma Sweta
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer After Prosecution Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant placing him on his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence of a witness who was stood down can be relied upon at this stage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against the accused, Dedan Ouma Sweta, for the alleged murder of Victor Owuor Okita. The evidence on record, including that of the witness who was stood down, was deemed sufficient at this stage to require the accused to be placed on his defence. The court clarified that the weight and probative value of the evidence, and whether it proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt, would be determined at the end of the trial. The court emphasized that the threshold at this stage is not proof beyond reasonable doubt but whether there is a case to answer, and found that threshold met.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
Orders
- The accused, Dedan Ouma Sweta, is found to have a case to answer for the alleged murder of Victor Owuor Okita.
- The accused is placed on his defence in accordance with Article 50(2)(i),(k),(l) of the Constitution and Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Republic v Sweta (Criminal Case 20 of 2018) [2023] KEHC 17902 (KLR) (31 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 17902 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Case 20 of 2018
RE Aburili, J
May 31, 2023
Between
Republic
Prosecutor
and
Dedan Ouma Sweta
Accused
Ruling
1. I have considered the evidence of the four (4) prosecution witnesses and the written submissions by the defence counsel. At this stage, the court is not considering whether proof of the case against the accused is made beyond reasonable doubt but whether a prima facie case has been made out by the prosecution to warrant placing the accused person on his defence.
2. Counsel for the accused has urged the court to find that the evidence of the witness who was stood down should not be relied upon. That witness took oath and testified to a certain extent before being stood down.
3. There is no reason why the court should not rely on that evidence in its determination since the witness was competently led through her testimony. The only question would be the weight and or probative value to be placed on that evidence, the court having ruled that the issue of marriage between her and the accused was a matter of sufficient evidence being raised and perhaps that why she was stood down.
4. On whether a prima facie case has been made against the accused person to warrant placing the accused person on his defence, I have considered the evidence on record and without delving into the merits thereto, I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out against the accused person to warrant him to be placed on his defence. A prima facie case, it should be noted, is not necessarily one that must succeed. The evidence by the witness who was stood down is not the only evidence which the prosecution called.
5. The question of whether that evidence proves the guilt of the accused person beyond reasonable doubt, whether he tenders his defence or not can only be determined at the end of the trial.
6. This court finds that the justice of this case demands that the accused be placed on his defence.
7. Accordingly, I find and hold that the accused person herein Dedan Ouma Sweta has a case to answer for the alleged murder of Victor Owuor Okita. He is accordingly placed on his defence and the provisions of Article 50 (2) (i) (k) and (l) of the Constitution are hereby complied with, as read with Section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. I so find.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 31STDAY OF MAY, 2023R. E. ABURILIJUDGE