[2010] KEHC 3482 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called six witnesses, had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. This finding requires the accused to be put on her defence in accordance with section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court therefore informed the accused...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 3482 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Teresia Ncororo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 68 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused put on her defence.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Procedure, Defence Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Teresia Ncororo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting her on her defence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called six witnesses, had adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. This finding requires the accused to be put on her defence in accordance with section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court therefore informed the accused of her rights to address the court, give evidence, make an unsworn statement, and call witnesses in her defence.
Court Disposition
Accused put on her defence.
Orders
- The accused is put on her defence and informed of her rights under section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
10 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
Criminal Case 68 of 2007
REPUBLIC ………………….………….. PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
TERESIA NCORORO ………..……..………. ACCUSED
RULING
The accused is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. Prosecution after calling 6 witnesses closed its case. I have considered the evidence adduced by prosecution and I find that prosecution has shown a prima facie case sufficient to put accused person to his defence. I now therefore inform the accused of his right to address the court either personally or by his advocate, to give evidence on his own behalf, or to make an unsworn statement, and to call witnesses in his defence.
Dated and delivered at Meru this 19th day of March 2010.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE