[2002] KEHC 227 (KLR)

[2002] KEHC 227 (KLR)

The court found that land documents held by the Lands Office are public documents, and the Land Registries are open to the public during working hours. There was no explanation from the respondent as to why the applicants were refused access. In the absence of any opposition or justification, the court was satisfied...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KEHC 227 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Khelef Khalifa; Applicant: Sheikh Ali Sheikh; Applicant: Sheikh Mohamed Dor; Applicant: Sheikh Juma Ngao; Applicant: Muni Mazrui; Applicant: Sheikh Mohamed Khalifa; Respondent: Commissioner of Lands
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 196 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judicial Review
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus, Public Documents Access, Land Registry Access
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Land and Property Judicial Review Mandamus Public Documents Access Land Registry Access

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Khelef Khalifa

Applicant

Sheikh Ali Sheikh

Applicant

Sheikh Mohamed Dor

Applicant

Sheikh Juma Ngao

Applicant

Muni Mazrui

Applicant

Sheikh Mohamed Khalifa

Applicant

Commissioner of Lands

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to access public documents held at the Lands Office.
  2. 2 Whether the Commissioner of Lands can lawfully refuse access to land registry documents to members of the public.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that land documents held by the Lands Office are public documents, and the Land Registries are open to the public during working hours. There was no explanation from the respondent as to why the applicants were refused access. In the absence of any opposition or justification, the court was satisfied that the orders sought by the applicants were appropriate and granted the application for judicial review by way of mandamus, compelling the Commissioner of Lands to allow access to the requested documents.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Orders of mandamus granted as prayed, compelling the Commissioner of Lands to allow access to the requested land documents.
  • Costs of the application awarded to the applicants.