[2005] KEHC 414 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant judicial review, specifically that the Municipal Council of Mombasa had not fulfilled its statutory obligation to prepare a valuation roll as required by law, and that there were credible allegations of failure by the Minister for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 414 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Respondent: Municipal Council of Mombasa; Respondent: Minister for Local Government (sued through the Attorney General); Respondent: Director of Physical Planning (sued through the Attorney General); Applicant: Maur Abdalla Bwanamaka
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 759 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders
- Outcome
- Leave granted to apply for orders of mandamus and prohibition. Leave to operate as stay. Costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Statutory Duties of Local Authorities, Valuation Rolls, Property Rates, Physical Planning, Development Permissions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Municipal Council of Mombasa
Respondent
Minister for Local Government (sued through the Attorney General)
Respondent
Director of Physical Planning (sued through the Attorney General)
Respondent
Maur Abdalla Bwanamaka
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Municipal Council of Mombasa has failed to perform its statutory duty to prepare a valuation roll as required by the Rating Act.
- 2 Whether the Minister for Local Government and the Director of Physical Planning have failed in their statutory duties regarding land planning and development permissions.
- 3 Whether leave should be granted to apply for orders of mandamus and prohibition against the respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant judicial review, specifically that the Municipal Council of Mombasa had not fulfilled its statutory obligation to prepare a valuation roll as required by law, and that there were credible allegations of failure by the Minister for Local Government and the Director of Physical Planning to perform their statutory duties. The court was satisfied that the circumstances justified granting leave to apply for orders of mandamus and prohibition, and that the leave should operate as a stay as requested.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to apply for orders of mandamus and prohibition. Leave to operate as stay. Costs in the cause.
Orders
- Leave to apply for orders of mandamus and prohibition is granted.
- The leave granted shall operate as a stay as prayed under prayer 3 of the Chamber Summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA MISC APPLICATION 759 OF 2004
IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION BY MAUR ABDALLA
BWANAMAKA FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR
ORDERS OF MANDAMUS AND
PROHIBITION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF:
REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………..……APPLICANT
VERSUS
1. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCILOF MOMBASA ….......................................………..1ST RESPONDENT
2. THE MINISTER FOR LOCAL GOVTsued through
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL…………….............................................…………...2nd RESPONDENT
3. THE DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLANNINGsued through
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ………………….............................................…..…3rd RESPONDENT
EXPARTE MAUR ABDALLA BWANAMAKA
R U L I N G
Before the court under certificate of urgency is an exparte Chamber Summons of Mr. MAUR ABDALLA for leave to take out Notice of Motion under Order 53 CPC against:
1. The Municipal Council of Mombasa
2. Minister for Local Government
3. The Director of Physical Planning.
The Applicant is a property owner and resident within the Municipality of Mombasa. His property is Plot No. MN/I/1853. the verifying affidavit shows that the first Respondent is under a statutory duty under Rating Act Cap.267 to levy rates by adopting various forms of rating in respect of properties under its jurisdiction.
The provisions of Rating Act Cap 266 apply. Section 3 of Cap 266 requires every local authority to cause to be prepared at least every 10 years. Valuation roll to be made in respect of every rateable property. That the last time the first Respondent caused a valuation of properties to be carried out and a valuation roll to be prepared was in the year 1991.
Nothing was done in the year 2000 but instead the council applied to the Minister for extension of time by 2 years up to 2002 and again up to 2005.
The applicant states that there is no sign that the Council will perform its statutory duty this time and it is poised to seek further extension.
It is sworn that since the year 1991 value of properties have increased. The council is not collecting correct rates thus improve its revenue base. Another complaint is that the Municipal Council is in breach of Physical Planning Act in granting development permission. And the Director of Physical Planning has failed in his statutory powers to guide the council in Land Planning matters and has permitted change of user of Land without adherence to the process of the law.
Consequently the applicant and other residents of Mombasa have suffered.
I have considered the above matters and submissions by Counsel. I am convinced that the exparte applicant has shown circumstances to warrant an examination of the dispute by way of Judicial Review.
I grant leave sought. The leave thus granted shall operate as stay as prayed under prayer 3 of Chamber Summons.
Costs shall be in the cause.
Notice of Motion to be filed within 21 days.
Read on 21/9/05 in open court.
Delivered and dated at Mombasa this 21st day of September 2005.
J. KHAMINWA
J U D G E