[2021] KEHC 6430 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6430 (KLR)

The court found that the ex parte applicants had not been served with the respondents' and interested parties' submissions and replying affidavits, and that they were entitled to reply to any new issues of law or fact raised therein. The court also noted that Dr. Benson Mutisya Muthui had indicated his lack of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 6430 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Respondent: The Principal Secretary, State Department of Livestock; Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Co-operatives; Respondent: The Kenya Veterinary Board; Respondent: The Attorney General; Applicant: Dr. Elizabeth Ouko; Applicant: Mr. John Ngigi Nyumu; Applicant: Mr. Francis Muthuri Mutua; Respondent: Dr. Josiah Machuki Mandieka; Respondent: Dr. John Wilbeforce Muchibi; Respondent: Prof. James Mucunu Mbaria
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application 86 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Leave to Reply and to Strike Out Party
Outcome
Application allowed in part; leave to reply granted; party struck out; no order as to costs.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Leave to File Reply, Service of Documents, Striking Out Party, Judicial Review Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Administrative Law Leave to File Reply Service of Documents Striking Out Party Judicial Review Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

The Principal Secretary, State Department of Livestock

Respondent

The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Co-operatives

Respondent

The Kenya Veterinary Board

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Dr. Elizabeth Ouko

Applicant

Mr. John Ngigi Nyumu

Applicant

Mr. Francis Muthuri Mutua

Applicant

Dr. Josiah Machuki Mandieka

Respondent

Dr. John Wilbeforce Muchibi

Respondent

Prof. James Mucunu Mbaria

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Leave to Reply and to Strike Out Party

  1. 1 Whether the ex parte applicants should be granted leave to file a reply to the respondents' and interested parties' submissions and affidavits.
  2. 2 Whether Dr. Benson Mutisya Muthui should be struck out as a party to the proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether the application should be heard ex parte and certified as urgent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the ex parte applicants had not been served with the respondents' and interested parties' submissions and replying affidavits, and that they were entitled to reply to any new issues of law or fact raised therein. The court also noted that Dr. Benson Mutisya Muthui had indicated his lack of interest in the proceedings, justifying his removal as a party. The application was therefore certified urgent and granted ex parte, with leave given to the applicants to file and serve a reply within fourteen days, and Dr. Muthui was struck out from the proceedings. The court held that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents or interested parties by granting these orders,...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; leave to reply granted; party struck out; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The ex parte applicants' application dated 28th May 2021 is certified urgent and admitted to hearing ex parte.
  • Leave is granted to the ex parte applicants to file and serve a further affidavit and submissions in reply, limited to new facts and issues of law, within fourteen days.