[2008] KEHC 2650 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2650 (KLR)

The court found that the application raised serious issues regarding the jurisdiction of the Magarini Land Disputes Tribunal over land registered under the Registered Land Act, and the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for urgency. However, the complexity of the matter required that it be heard...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 2650 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kasiwa Ngowa Mwakale; Applicant: Kahindi Kaingu Jangaa; Respondent: Dhahabu Ngowa Mwakale; Respondent: Karisa Kenga Kazungu; Respondent: Kahindi Kenga Kazungu; Respondent: Chengo Kenga Kazungu; Respondent: Safari Kenga Kazungu; Respondent: Said Kasiwa Ngowa; Respondent: Magarini Division Land Disputes Tribunal Gongoni; Respondent: Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Malindi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 5 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave for Judicial Review Orders (mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition) and Interim Stay
Outcome
Application fixed for interpartes hearing; no substantive orders granted at this stage.
Judges
CA Ombija
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Registered Land, Mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Judicial Review Jurisdiction of Tribunals Registered Land Mandamus Certiorari Prohibition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kasiwa Ngowa Mwakale

Applicant

Kahindi Kaingu Jangaa

Applicant

Dhahabu Ngowa Mwakale

Respondent

Karisa Kenga Kazungu

Respondent

Kahindi Kenga Kazungu

Respondent

Chengo Kenga Kazungu

Respondent

Safari Kenga Kazungu

Respondent

Said Kasiwa Ngowa

Respondent

Magarini Division Land Disputes Tribunal Gongoni

Respondent

Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Malindi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave for Judicial Review Orders (mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition) and Interim Stay

  1. 1 Whether the Magarini Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to adjudicate on land registered under the Registered Land Act.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to leave to apply for orders of mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition against the Tribunal and Magistrate's Court.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents have legal standing or right to the disputed land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application raised serious issues regarding the jurisdiction of the Magarini Land Disputes Tribunal over land registered under the Registered Land Act, and the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for urgency. However, the complexity of the matter required that it be heard interpartes, with both sides given an opportunity to be heard. The court therefore directed that the application be set down for interpartes hearing after service on the respondents, without granting or denying the substantive reliefs sought at this stage.

Court Disposition

Application fixed for interpartes hearing; no substantive orders granted at this stage.

Orders

  • Matter to be fixed for interpartes hearing on a date to be set by the applicant after service on the respondents.
  • A copy of the order to be served on the respondent.