[2011] KEHC 4344 (KLR)

[2011] KEHC 4344 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established an arguable case for judicial review and that the circumstances warranted the grant of leave to commence proceedings. Furthermore, the court determined that it was appropriate for the leave to operate as a stay of further action in Thika Land Disputes Tribunal case...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] KEHC 4344 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: David Kimani Karogo; Respondent: Thika Land Disputes Tribunal; Respondent: Florence Gathoni Nduati; Respondent: Resident Magistrates Court Thika
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 78 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Judicial Review Proceedings
Outcome
Leave to commence judicial review proceedings granted; leave to operate as stay.
Judges
CC Kipkorir
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Leave to Apply, Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition, Tribunal Decisions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Judicial Review Leave to Apply Certiorari Mandamus Prohibition Tribunal Decisions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Kimani Karogo

Applicant

Thika Land Disputes Tribunal

Respondent

Florence Gathoni Nduati

Respondent

Resident Magistrates Court Thika

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Judicial Review Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established an arguable case for leave to commence judicial review proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether leave should operate as a stay of proceedings in Thika Land Disputes Tribunal case No. 5/2006.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established an arguable case for judicial review and that the circumstances warranted the grant of leave to commence proceedings. Furthermore, the court determined that it was appropriate for the leave to operate as a stay of further action in Thika Land Disputes Tribunal case No. 5/2006, in order to preserve the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the substantive application. The court directed the applicant to file and serve the main application within 15 days, with the respondents to reply within 15 days of service.

Court Disposition

Leave to commence judicial review proceedings granted; leave to operate as stay.

Orders

  • Leave to bring judicial review proceedings is granted.
  • Leave granted shall operate as a stay of further action in Thika Land Disputes Tribunal case No. 5/2006.