[2018] KEHC 9133 (KLR)
The court found that there were no compelling reasons to deny the accused bond. The pre-bail report showed the accused had strong family and community ties, no prior criminal record, and both the deceased's family and the community did not object to his release. The only concern was the accused's drinking habit,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 9133 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Republic; Applicant: Tony Odinga Madara
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 45 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bond granted with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Compelling Reasons, Pre Bail Report, Murder Charge
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Respondent
Tony Odinga Madara
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to release on bond pending trial for murder.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bond under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were no compelling reasons to deny the accused bond. The pre-bail report showed the accused had strong family and community ties, no prior criminal record, and both the deceased's family and the community did not object to his release. The only concern was the accused's drinking habit, which allegedly contributed to the offence, but this was not deemed sufficient to constitute a compelling reason to deny bond. The court therefore granted bond with specific conditions, including monitoring of the accused's drinking problem by the probation officer.
Court Disposition
Bond granted with conditions.
Orders
- Accused may be released on his own bond of Ksh 600,000 plus two sureties of a like amount.
- The sureties shall be approved by the Deputy Registrar of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL CASE NO 45 OF 2017
REPUBLIC.....................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
TONY ODINGA MADARA..................ACCUSED
R U L I N G
1. The accused, Tony Odinga Madara is charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code, the particulars being that on the 27th day of October, 2017 at Emanuria village, Ikomero sub-location, Eshirombe Location in Khwisero Sub-County within Kakamega County murdered ELDAH OYIERA OBULINJI. He has denied committing the offence and is awaiting trial.
2. Meantime, the accused, through his counsel Mr. Aburili prays that he be released on bond, as provided under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution, 2010. According to the foresaid provisions, the accused is entitled to bond on reasonable bond terms unless the prosecution can show compelling reasons why bond should not be granted
3. On the day the application for bond was made, prosecution counsel while not explicitly objecting to the same asked that court be supplied with pre-bail report before granting the bond.
4. The pre-bail report dated 18th May, 2018 has now been provided. From that report, the accused is said to be 36 years old and is the oldest of his four siblings. He completed form four at Xavier Secondary School in Nairobi and has never had any formal employment. He does manual jobs in the locality for a living though he has no wife at the moment he is the father of one child. He is said to have separated with his wife JOYCE NJOKI.
5. From the report, it is also established as follows;- the deceased was paternal grandmother of the accused. The Accused’s family is monogamous. Though the accused abuses alcohol, (local brews) and smokes cigarettes, he had never been in conflict with the law before. The accused has close community and family ties. Both the deceased’s family and the community at large have no problem with accused being released on bond.
6. Taking all the above into account, I am satisfied that there are no compelling reasons why accused may not be released on bond. The only issue of concern to the court is, and as indicated in the report, the accused’s inability to control his d drinking habit. Infact from the record, the accused allegedly committed the offence while under influence of alcohol. There is therefore a need for the accused to be assisted to deal with his drinking problem.
7. Having found that there are no compelling reasons why accused may not be released on bond, I allow the application and make the following specific orders:-
1. Accused may be released on his own bond of Ksh six hundred thousand (ksh.600,000/=) plus two (2)sureties of a like amount.
2. The sureties shall be approved by the DR of this honourable court.
3. Once released on bond, accused shall abide by all the bond terms failing which the bond shall be cancelled.
4. The probation officer shall furnish another P.O.R in December more specifically on 5th December 2018 for the purpose of confirming to the court how the accused is coping with his drinking problem.
5. Case fixed for hearing on 05. 12. 2018
6. Mention on 17. 09. 2018
7. Until he is released on bond the accused shall remain in custody.
Orders accordingly
RUTH N. SITATI
22. 05. 2018
In the presences of:-
.Miss Tarus ……………………....for state
Mr. Munyembo for Aburili ……….for accused
Erick Zalo………………….court Assistant