[2017] KEHC 5367 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution failed to call any witnesses or adduce any evidence against the accused during the re-trial. As a result, no prima facie case was established to warrant the accused being put on his defence. In the absence of any evidence linking the accused to the offence of murder, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 5367 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Vincent Ondieki Omao
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 84 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Re Trial After Appeal and Quashing of Original Conviction
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Retrial, Acquittal, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Vincent Ondieki Omao
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Re Trial After Appeal and Quashing of Original Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case against the accused for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether the absence of prosecution witnesses warranted an acquittal of the accused.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution failed to call any witnesses or adduce any evidence against the accused during the re-trial. As a result, no prima facie case was established to warrant the accused being put on his defence. In the absence of any evidence linking the accused to the offence of murder, the court was compelled to enter a verdict of not guilty and acquit the accused, in accordance with the law.
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- The accused is acquitted of the charge of murder.
- The accused is to be set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 84 OF 2005
REPUBLIC .................................................................................................................STATE
VERSUS
VINCENT ONDIEKI OMAO .......................................................................................ACCUSED
JUDGMENT
The accused VINCENT ONDIEKI OMAO was charged with the offence of MURDER CONTRARY TO SECTION 203 as read with SECTION 204 OF THE PENAL CODE. The particulars of the charge were that
“On the 5th and 6th days of September, 2005 at Gosemia Village Keringet Molo in Nakuru District of the Rift Valley Province murderd LABAN MANENO ONGERA”
The accused pleaded ‘Not Guilty’ to the charge and his matter was set down for a full hearing.
As can be seen this is very old 2005 matter. The trial did in fact proceed and by a judgment delivered on 7th May, 2008 the accused was found guilty and was convicted for the offence of murder and sentence to death. The accused filed an appeal challenging his conviction and by its judgment dated 23/2/2013 the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside both the conviction and sentence of death and directed that a re-trial be conducted.
The accused was brought back to the High Court for re-trial on 22/1/2013. From that date to the present time the prosecution have totally failed to avail even a single witness for the re-trial. After several adjournments and four (4) years down the line the learned Stated Counsel on 20/12/2016 indicated that no witness could be traced as the witnesses were said to have moved to a new location and he closed his case.
Clearly no prima facie case has been made out. Not a single witness was called to adduce any evidence against the accused. As such I enter a verdict of ‘Not Guilty’ and I acquit the accused of this charge of murder. The accused is to be set at liberty forthwith unless he is otherwise lawfully held.
Dated and Delivered in Nakuru this 31st day of March, 2017.
Ms Kerubo holding brief for Ms Ndeda
Mr. Motende for State
Maureen A. Odero
Judge