[2006] KEHC 1172 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant, a young man, had served two years of the five-year sentence for handling stolen goods, had shown remorse, and had been rehabilitated. The stolen items were returned to the lawful owner. Considering these factors, the court held that the period already served constituted adequate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1172 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Republic; Respondent: Wanyeki Njuguna
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 10 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; sentence reduced to period served; appellant released unless otherwise lawfully held
- Legal Topics
- Handling Stolen Goods, Sentencing, Mitigation, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Appellant
Wanyeki Njuguna
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of five years imprisonment for handling stolen goods was excessive in the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the appellant's mitigation and period already served warranted a reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant, a young man, had served two years of the five-year sentence for handling stolen goods, had shown remorse, and had been rehabilitated. The stolen items were returned to the lawful owner. Considering these factors, the court held that the period already served constituted adequate punishment and that further incarceration was unnecessary. The sentence was therefore reduced to the period already served, and the appellant was ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; sentence reduced to period served; appellant released unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The sentence of five years imprisonment is reduced to the period already served.
- The appellant is to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
Criminal Appeal 10 of 2005
[From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 5382 of 2004 in the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Nyahururu Kathoka Ngomo – S.P.M. ]
REPUBLIC……………………………..................………………..……….APPELLANT
VERSUS
WANYEKI NJUGUNA…….…...................………….……………….…RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
The appellant was charged with the offence of handling stolen goods contrary to section 322(2) of the penal code. The particulars of the charge stated that on the 23rd day of December, 2004 at Gatondo village in Nyandarua District within central Province, otherwise then in the course of stealing dishonesty received or retained two bicycles, knowing or having reason to believe them to e stolen goods.
The appellant was convicted on his own plead of guilty and sentenced by the Senior Principal Magistrate at Nyahururu to five years imprisonment.
During the hearing of this appeal, the appellant pleaded with this court to reduce the sentence imposed upon him on the grounds that he was reformed since he was incarcerated in lawful custody since 30th December, 2004. He urged the Court to consider the mitigation he offered before the lower court and the fact that he was forced by circumstances to commit the offence. Now that he has reformed he is ready to become a useful member of the society and to fed for his family. This appeal was opposed by the learned Senior State Counsel. Mr. Koech on behalf of the State.
I have considered the facts of this matter and the circumstances of the appellant who is fairly young man and the fact that the stolen items were uttered to be lawful owner and more so the fact that the appellant has been rehabilitated and intends to become a useful member of the society, moreover out of the period of 5 years the appellant has served two years which I consider to be adequate punishment. Accordingly, I hereby reduce the sentence of 5 years and commute the same with the period served.
The appeal is hereby allowed and unless the appellant is otherwise lawfully held, he is set at liberty in regard to the conviction and sentence imposed on him in this matter.
It is so ordered.
Judgement read and signed in Nakuru this 9th day of August, 2006.
MARTHA KOOME
JUDGE
9. 8.2006
Before: Martha Koome
Mwiti: Court Clerk
Gumo for the state
Appellant present
Judgement read and signed in Nakuru on 9th August, 2006.
MARTHA KOOME
JUDGE