[2018] KEHC 359 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 359 (KLR)

The High Court held that it is functus officio and lacks jurisdiction to review a sentence that is the subject of a pending appeal before the Court of Appeal. Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits the High Court from entertaining a revision application where an appeal has been filed and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 359 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Wilfred Kioji Muteria; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 109 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
BB Limo
Legal Topics
Sentence Review, Murder Conviction, Appeal Pending, Functus Officio, Supreme Court Guidelines
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Review Murder Conviction Appeal Pending Functus Officio Supreme Court Guidelines

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilfred Kioji Muteria

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the High Court can review a sentence when an appeal is pending before the Court of Appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu applies to the applicant's request for sentence review in light of pending appeals.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court held that it is functus officio and lacks jurisdiction to review a sentence that is the subject of a pending appeal before the Court of Appeal. Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits the High Court from entertaining a revision application where an appeal has been filed and is pending determination. The Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu, while relevant to the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence, does not override the statutory bar on review in cases where an appeal is pending. Therefore, the application for sentence review is incompetent and must be disallowed. The applicants are advised to pursue their appeals in the Court of Appeal.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for review of sentence is disallowed.
  • Applicants are advised to pursue their appeals in the Court of Appeal.