[2018] KEHC 7705 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 7705 (KLR)

The court found that the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. As a result, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court was satisfied that the threshold for a case to answer had...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 7705 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: William Karuti Aloise
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 28 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law / Ruling on Case to Answer
Outcome
accused put on his defence
Judges
A Mabeya
Legal Topics
Prima Facie Case, Case to Answer, Criminal Procedure, Defence Hearing
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Prima Facie Case Case to Answer Criminal Procedure Defence Hearing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

William Karuti Aloise

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Law / Ruling on Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the prosecution had presented sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case against the accused. As a result, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with Section 211 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court was satisfied that the threshold for a case to answer had been met based on the evidence and submissions presented.

Court Disposition

accused put on his defence

Orders

  • The accused is hereby placed on his defence.
  • Section 211 of the CPC complied with.