[2018] KEHC 7256 (KLR)
The court considered the mandatory nature of the death penalty for murder under sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code, but applied the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another v. Republic, which grants judicial discretion to impose a sentence other than death. The court weighed the accused's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 7256 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Wilson Mwangi Githinji; Defendant: Simon Ndambari Gatumu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 70 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Judges
- FM Mutuku
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing Discretion, Mitigation, Penal Code Section 203 204
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Wilson Mwangi Githinji
Defendant
Simon Ndambari Gatumu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentencing Ruling After Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to death or a lesser sentence for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether the period spent in custody and the accused's mitigation should affect the sentence imposed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the mandatory nature of the death penalty for murder under sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code, but applied the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another v. Republic, which grants judicial discretion to impose a sentence other than death. The court weighed the accused's mitigation, including his age at the time of the offence, time spent in custody, lack of previous criminal record, and family circumstances. However, the court noted the accused's lack of remorse as he continued to deny involvement. Balancing these factors, the court determined that a sentence of 15 years' imprisonment was fair and proportionate in the circumstances, taking...
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Wilson Mwangi Githinji is sentenced to fifteen (15) years imprisonment for the offence of murder.
- The sentence takes into account the period already spent in custody during the trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 70 OF 2013
REPUBLIC.....................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
WILSON MWANGI GITHINJI....................1ST ACCUSED
SIMON NDAMBARI GATUMU..................2ND ACCUSED
RULING ON SENTENCE
Wilson Mwangi Githinji has been tried, found guilty and convicted for the offence of murder of Grace Njeri Leposo contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code in a judgment delivered on 25th January 2018. Grace Njeri Leposo was murdered in her house on 11th June 2013 and her body cut into pieces. Wilson Mwangi Githinji was jointly charged with Simon Ndambari Gatumu but the court acquitted Simon for lack of evidence. The prosecution informed the court after the judgment was delivered that there were no previous criminal records against the accused. This court has therefore treated him as a first offender.
In mitigation before sentencing, Mrs. Nyamongo counsel for the accused submitted that the accused was just 19 years old when the offence was committed and from 24th June 2013 when he was arrested to the time he was found guilty and convicted for murder he had been in custody for about four (4) years. Counsel urged the court to take this into account in sentencing the accused. She further submitted that there has been no negative report against the accused; that he has rehabilitated well while in remand; that the accused is the last born in his family and the mother died while in custody after her arrest in connection with this offence; that the accused sympathizes with the manner the deceased met her death and that he still denies causing her death because he had no reason to kill her. Mrs. Nyamongo asked this court to exercise discretion and give the accused another chance in life.
I have considered the mitigation of the accused. He still denies having taken part in killing the deceased. This court in its reasoned judgment found him guilty of this crime. The accused is not remorseful because he maintains that he did not kill the deceased. In sentencing the accused this court has taken into account his mitigation, the circumstances surrounding this offence and the fact that the accused still maintains that he is innocent. The penalty for murder is death. However following the decision of the Supreme Court in Petition No. 15 of 2015 Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another v. Republic & Katiba Institute with 5 othersas Amicii Curaii, this court now has discretion to give the accused any other sentence other than death. I am alive to the fact that no sentence no matter how stiff can compensate for the loss of life of the deceased. I therefore consider a sentence of 15 years as fair in the circumstances. Consequently, I hereby sentence Wilson Mwangi Githinji to fifteen (15) years imprisonment. This sentence has been determined after taking into account that Wilson Mwangi Githinji has stayed in prison custody during the pendency of this trial. Right of appeal within 14 days from today has been explained to the accused. Orders shall issue accordingly.
Delivered, dated and signed this 7th day of March 2018.
S. N. Mutuku
Judge