[2021] KEELRC 85 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 85 (KLR)

The court found that the ex-parte applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for his absence on 3 May 2021, as the only reason advanced was the advocate's difficulty logging into the virtual court, which was not substantiated. Furthermore, the court held that the applicant's underlying claim related to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 85 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Applicant: Wilson Sabwami; Respondent: The Principal/Secretary, Board of Management, St Patricks Naitiri High School; Respondent: Chairman, Board of Management, St Patricks Naitiri Boys Highschool; Interested Party: St Patricks Naitiri Boys Highschool
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion to Restore Dismissed Summons
Outcome
motion dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Breach of Contract, Judicial Review Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Breach of Contract Judicial Review Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Wilson Sabwami

Applicant

The Principal/Secretary, Board of Management, St Patricks Naitiri High School

Respondent

Chairman, Board of Management, St Patricks Naitiri Boys Highschool

Respondent

St Patricks Naitiri Boys Highschool

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion to Restore Dismissed Summons

  1. 1 Whether the ex-parte applicant has provided sufficient explanation for failure to attend court on 3 May 2021.
  2. 2 Whether the dismissed summons should be restored to allow judicial review proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether judicial review is the proper procedure for claims of breach of contract and unfair termination of employment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the ex-parte applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for his absence on 3 May 2021, as the only reason advanced was the advocate's difficulty logging into the virtual court, which was not substantiated. Furthermore, the court held that the applicant's underlying claim related to breach of contract and unfair termination of employment, which should be pursued through a Memorandum or Statement of Claim as required by the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, not by judicial review. Restoring the dismissed summons would be futile since the threshold for granting leave to commence judicial review proceedings was not met. Accordingly, the...

Court Disposition

motion dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The motion to restore the dismissed summons is dismissed with costs.